摘要
一、引言学界在小河西和兴隆洼文化的划分上有不同意见:有的学者认为小河西和兴隆洼是两个独立的、年代相近[1]或前后相继的考古学文化[2],有的学者则把小河西类遗存视为兴隆洼文化最早的一期[3]。但无论持何种观点,基本都同意"小河西"指代一种以夹砂素面筒形罐(亦有戳点纹和简单的附加堆纹)为代表的遗存,"兴隆洼"则是以施刻划纹和压印之字纹筒形罐为代表的遗存。
It is generally accepted that the ages of Xinglongwa culture and Xiaohexi culture are 6200~5200/5000BC,and before 6200BC respectively.Based on analysis on dating material,dating methods,and the discrepancies between 14C dates and relative dates,we recognized that the present 14C dates of these two cultures contain several problematic ones.Reject which,the ages of Xinglongwa and Xiaohexi culture become 5780-5150BC,and 5900-5730BC.In consideration the short span of the age of Xiaohexi culture,we believe it is necessary to rediscuss the question-whether the so-called‘Xiaohexi culture’is an independent archaeological culture or an early phase of Xinglongwa culture.
出处
《边疆考古研究》
2019年第2期53-62,共10页
Research of China＇s Frontier Archaeology
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“华南地区新旧石器过渡文化研究”(17CKG002)
