在共同体中实现善好生活——《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中个体与共同体关系新论被引量：1

Living a Good Life in a Community——A New Theory on the relationship between individual and community in Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要青年马克思思想的哲学性吸引了许多英美政治哲学学者的兴趣,《1844年经济学哲学手稿》成为了他们探索何谓善好生活、个体与共同体关系等问题的重要文本。丹尼尔·布鲁德尼通过对《手稿》的深入解读认为,人们能过上善好生活意味着他们可以从事实现人的本性的活动,而人的本性之实现过程,既包括自我实现,也包括相互成全。这种主体间相互成全与相互依赖的关系构成了一种既承认个体性也承认共同性的特殊的共同体。马克思一方面力图摆脱哲学的方式对共产主义中人与世界的关系进行论证,但另一方面他却无法做出充分的论证说明普遍的人的本性,也难以证明共产主义社会中人对世界关系的看法就是正确的。虽然该解读遭到一些学者的反对,但布鲁德尼却能较好地为自己辩护。从个体与共同体的关系出发研究《手稿》、评议其当代解读,我们看到:资本主义私有制有违《手稿》所呈现的善好生活理念,包括布鲁德尼在内的马克思主义者力图寻求更严密的论证对资本主义社会的种种问题进行彻底的批判和扬弃。 The philosophical nature of young Marx’s thought has attracted the interest of many Anglophone political philosophers.The Economic and Philosophical Manuscript of 1844 has become an important text for them to explore such issues as what is a good life and the relationship between individuals and communities.Through an in-depth interpretation of the manuscript,Daniel Brudney believes that living a good life means that people can engage in activities to realize human nature,and the realization process of human nature includes both selfrealization and helping others fulfill themselves.This relationship of interdependence constitutes a special community that recognizes both individuality and commonality.On the one hand,Marx tried to get rid of the philosophical way to demonstrate the relationship between people in communist society and the world,but on the other hand,he could not make a convincing argument to explain the universal human nature,and it was difficult to prove that the view of people in the communist society on nan’s relationship with the world is correct.Although this interpretation is opposed by some scholars,Brudney defends himself.From the perspective of the relationship between individual and community to esearch the Economic and Philosophical Manuscript of 1844 and review the contemporary interpretation,we could see that the capitalist private ownership is against the good life which is showed in the text,Marxist including Brudney try to search for more rigorous argument to criticize capitalist society thoroughly.

作者李毅琳 LI Yi-lin

机构地区复旦大学哲学学院

出处《当代国外马克思主义评论》 2021年第2期300-316,共17页 Contemporary Marxism Review

关键词善好生活共同体共产主义 1844年经济学哲学手稿人的本性 Good Life Community Communism Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 Human Nature

分类号 A811 [哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]

作者简介李毅琳,复旦大学哲学学院博士生

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献2

1K.弗里克舒,刘凤娟.康德的目的王国:形而上学的,而非政治的[J].世界哲学,2015(6):55-69. 被引量：5
2曲轩,林进平.马克思视野中的共产主义是什么样的共同体?[J].中国人民大学学报,2019,33(1):42-50. 被引量：17

二级参考文献21

1Andrews Reath,“ Legislating for a Realm of Ends: the Social Dimension of Autonomy ”,in Agency andAutonomy, Oxford University Press, 2006,p. 173.
2Christine Korsgaard, “Creating the Kingdom of Ends: Reciprocity and Responsibility in Personal Relations”,inCreating the Kingdom of Ends, Cambridge University Press, 1996,p. 193.
3Barbara Herman, “A Cosmopolitan Kingdom of Ends”,in Reclaiming the History ofEthics: Essays in Honour of John Rawls, B. Herman,C. Korsgaard and A. Reath eds.,Cambridge University Press, 1997,pp. 187 -214.
4罗尔斯在其《道德哲学史讲演录》.哈佛大学出版社,2000.第143 - 214页.
5LudwigSiep, “Wozu eine Metaphysik derSitten” in Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Ein kooperativer Kommentar, Otfried Hoffe ed.,Klostermann, 1989.
6Allen Wood, “The Final Form of Kant,s Practical Philosophy”, in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals : Interpretative Essays,Mark Timmons ed.,Oxford University Press,2002,pp. 1 - 22.
7Bemd Ludwig, “Whence Public Right The Role of Theoretical and Practical Reasoning in Kant’s Doctrine ofRight”,in Timmons, Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals, pp. 159 -185.
8Thomas Pogge, in “The Categorical Imperative”,Hoffe, in Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, pp. 172 - 193.
9KatrinFlikschuh,“ Kant’s Indemonstrable Postulate ofRight: A Response to Paul Guyer”,in Kantian Review 12, 2007, pp. 1-39.
10Onora O’Neill, “Universal Law and Ends-in-themselves”,in Constructions of Reason,Cambridge University Press, 1989, pp. 126 - 144.