摘要
《最高人民法院关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》对于受害人的残疾赔偿金等赔偿项目采用受诉法院所在地标准,但由于海事法院具有跨行政区划的特性,受诉法院所在地指向并不明确。除南京海事法院的认定标准尚不明朗外,当前我国其他十家海事法院的审判实践做法不尽相同,甚至存在截然相反的观点和做法。考察我国当前的海事审判实践,海事法院所在地应当是指海事法院的管辖区域。对具体案件而言,应当适用最密切联系原则认定受诉法院所在地。
The Judicial Interpretations of Supreme People’s Court on Compensation for Personal Injuries has adopted the standard of the venue of court which entertained the case in the compensation for loss of life or personal injuries.Owing to the characteristics of cross-administrative divisions of the maritime courts,the venue of a maritime court is not very clear.In addition to the unclear criteria for the newly established Nanjing Maritime Court,the trial practices of other ten maritime courts in China are different and even opposite.In view of the current maritime trial practice in China,the venue of maritime court shall refer to its territory of jurisdiction.The venue of maritime court ought to be uniformly determined by the doctrine of the closest connection.
作者
朱元达
ZHU Yuanda(Shanghai Maritime Court,Shanghai 200135)
出处
《海大法律评论》
2020年第1期264-276,共13页
SMU Law Review
关键词
海事法院
人身损害赔偿
受诉法院所在地
maritime court
compensation for loss of life or personal injury
determination of venue of court
作者简介
朱元达,法律硕士,上海海事法院自由贸易试验区法庭法官助理。
