摘要
维特根斯坦在《逻辑哲学论》最后一节中所谈论的沉默是否有对象,是一个有争议的问题。传统解读认为最后一节中的沉默是有对象的,并且其对象就是不可言说的东西。而以逻辑实证主义解读和决然解读为代表的非传统解读则认为,并不存在不可言说的东西,进而最后一节中的沉默其实是没有对象的。然而非传统解读的观点不论从文本证据还是内容层面来看都存在一定问题。相反,传统解读对沉默的看法则更为自然,也更贴近维特根斯坦的原意。
Whether the silence that Wittgenstein mentions in the last section of the Tractatus has an object or not is a controversial issue.The traditional reading thinks that the silence in the last section has objects,and these objects are just things that cannot be put into words.However,some non-traditional readings,represented by the logical positivist reading and the resolute reading,holds that there are no such things that cannot be put into words,so the silence in the last section has no object at all.But the point of the non-traditional reading is problematic both in textual level and content level.On the contrary,the point of the traditional reading is more natural and closer to Wittgenstein’s original thoughts.
作者
张天艺
ZHANG Tian-yi(Department of Philosophy,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China)
出处
《科学技术哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第2期44-50,共7页
Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
作者简介
张天艺(1989-),男,云南昆明人,中山大学哲学系博士研究生,研究方向为维特根斯坦哲学、分析哲学。
