期刊文献+

LVIS支架一期辅助栓塞颅内多发动脉瘤的疗效分析 被引量:6

Analysis of the Therapeutic Effect of LVIS Stent on Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms Assisted by Primary Embolization
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨LVIS支架一期辅助栓塞治疗颅内多发动脉瘤的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析使用LVIS支架一期辅助栓塞治疗颅内多发动脉瘤共35例(73枚动脉瘤)患者的资料,其中单支架组19例(38枚动脉瘤)、多支架组16例(35枚动脉瘤),通过比较两组动脉瘤的栓塞程度、围手术期并发症及随访mRS评分,评估LVIS支架不同应用方式治疗颅内多发动脉瘤的有效性和安全性。结果单支架组共置入19个支架,多支架组共置入32个支架。两组术后即刻有效栓塞:单支架组30/38(78.9%),多支架组28/35(80%);两组随访有效栓塞:单支架组29/32(90.6%),多支架组28/30(93.3%)。两组共有5枚支架打开不良,4枚支架血栓形成,术后6个月mRS评分(0~2分)74.2%,两组围手术期支架相关并发症及术后6个月mRS评分比较无统计学意义(P=0.372,P=0.876)。结论应用LVIS单支架或多支架一期辅助栓塞治疗颅内多发动脉瘤安全、有效,重视术中支架释放方法及技巧,提高支架使用的安全性。 Objective To investigate the safety and effectiveness of Lvis stent in the treatment of multiple intracranial aneurysms with primary auxiliary embolization.Methods Retrospective analysis of the data of 35 patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms(73 aneurysms)treated with Lvis stent primary auxiliary embolization,including 19 patients with single stent group(38 aneurysms)and 16 patients with multiple stent group(35 aneurysms).By comparing the embolization,perioperative complications and follow-up mRS scores of the two groups of aneurysms,the effectiveness and safety of different methods of treating multiple intracranial aneurysms with Lvis stent were evaluated.Results A total of 19 stents were placed in the single stent group and 32 stents were placed in the multiple stent group.The two groups had immediate effective embolization after surgery:single stent group 30/38(78.9%),multiple stent group 28/35(80%),and two groups of follow-up effective embolization:single stent group 29/32(90.6%),Multiple stent group 28/30(93.3%).In the two groups,there were 5 stents with poor opening and 4 stent thrombosis.The mRS score(0-2)was 74.2%at 6 months after surgery.There was no statistical significance between the perioperative stent related complications and mRS score at 6 months(P=0.372,P=0.876).Conclusion The use of Lvis single stent or multiple stent auxiliary embolization in the treatment of MIA is safe,effective,and emphasizes the method and technique of stent release during surgery to improve the safety of stent use.
作者 凌国源 莫立根 林雄 严峻 雷奕 刘红 LING Guoyuan;MO Ligen;LIN Xiong(Department of Neurosurgery,Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University,Nanning,Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 530021,P.R.China)
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2020年第10期2083-2087,共5页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
基金 广西自然科学基金面上项目(编号:2018GXNSFAA281151)
关键词 颅内多发动脉瘤 LVIS支架 支架辅助栓塞 Multiple intracranial aneurysms LVIS stent Stent-assisted coiling
作者简介 通讯作者:莫立根
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献66

  • 1黄清海,刘建民,洪波,许奕,赵瑞,陈军.药物洗脱支架治疗颅内动脉及颅外椎动脉狭窄[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2006,11(2):55-57. 被引量:21
  • 2Rinkel GJ, Djibuti M, Algra A, et al. Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review D J. Stroke, 1998, 29: 251 - 256.
  • 3Feigin VL, Rinkel GJ, Lawes CM, et al. Risk factors for subarachnoid hemorrhage: an updated systematic review of epidemiological studies [J] Stroke, 2005, 36: 2773 - 2780.
  • 4Pleizier CM, Ruigrok YM, Rinkel GJ. Relation between age and number of aneurysms in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage [J] Cerebrovasc Dis, 2002, 14: 51 - 53.
  • 5Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd, et al. U nruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment [J]. Lancet, 2003, 362: 103 - 110.
  • 6van Gijn J, Kerr RS, Rinkel Gj. Subarachnoid haemorrhage[J]. Lancet, 2007,369: 306 - 318.
  • 7Mitchell P, Gholkar A, Vindlacheruvu R, et al. U nruptured intracranial aneurysms: benign curiosity or ticking bomb- [J] Lancet Neurol, 2004, 3: 85 - 92.
  • 8Weir B. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a review [J]. J Neurosurg, 2002, 96: 3 - 42.
  • 9White PM, Wardlaw JM. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms [J] J Neuroradiol, 2003, 30: 336 - 350.
  • 10Juvela S. Risk factors for multiple intracranial aneurysms [J]. Stroke, 2000, 31: 392 - 397.

共引文献101

同被引文献57

引证文献6

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部