摘要
我国现行立法承认违约责任与侵权责任之间存在竞合的情形,但目前仅有我国《合同法》第122条和《民法总则》第186条规定了竞合情形下受损方当事人的选择权,尚无立法对其处理规则予以明确,由此引发了实务中受害人难以行使选择权以及损害得不到完全赔偿或发生双重赔偿的问题。我国当前对违约责任与侵权责任竞合的规定过于简单,随着社会生活的复杂化,愈加不能满足案件处理的要求。本文试图通过讨论两种责任的竞合原因,对比大陆法系、普通法系和我国立法,分别从解释论和立法论的角度寻求这一问题的解决方法。
The current domestic legislation recognizes the existence of the breach of contract liability and the tort liability,but at present only Article 122 of the Contract Law and Article 186 of the General Principles of the Civil Law stipulate the injured party in the case of competing circumstances.The right to choose,there is no legislation to clarify its handling rules,which raises the problem that victims in practice are difficult to exercise their choice and damage is not fully compensated or double compensation occurs.China’s current competition for breach of contract liability and tort liability is too simple.With the complexity of social life,it is increasingly unable to meet the requirements of case handling.This paper tries to compare the civil law system,the common law system and the Chinese legislation by discussing the reasons for the competition of the two kinds of responsibilities,and seek solutions to this problem from the perspective of interpretation and legislation.
出处
《贸大法律评论》
2019年第1期47-57,共11页
Uibe Legal Science
关键词
责任竞合
赔偿
边界模糊
竞合模式
responsibility competition
compensation
boundary fuzzy
competition mode
作者简介
尹竹,南京大学法学院硕士研究生。
