摘要
我国民商事实体法明确赋予了作为自治性规则的习惯的司法适用地位。但由于这类规范在性质上具有复杂多元的客观属性,因此,在法典编纂的过程中不宜将习惯笼统地作为一类独立的法律渊源,进而机械地为其设定司法适用地位以及顺序。应当在成文法律的框架内,将不同民商事习惯区别对待和处理,并透过合理的程序步骤确定民商事习惯相对于成文法能动的补充性适用地位。
China’s civil and commercial substantive law clearly gives the judicial application status of custom as an autonomous rule.However,due to the complex and diverse objective nature of such norms,it is not appropriate to regard customs as a kind of independent legal source in the process of codification,and then mechanically set their judicial application status and order.In the framework of written law,different civil and commercial customs should be treated and dealt with differently,and the dynamic complementary application status of civil and commercial customs relative to written law should be determined through reasonable procedural steps.
作者
宋阳
陈莹
Song Yang;Chen Ying
出处
《民间法》
2021年第2期50-68,共19页
基金
国家社科基金项目《国际商事惯例适用问题研究》(编号:16BFX195)
关键词
民商事习惯
法律多元
法律渊源
司法适用
Civil and Commercial Customs
Legal Pluralism
Sources of Law
Judicial Application
作者简介
宋阳,法学博士,河北大学国家治理法治化研究中心研究员;陈莹,河北大学法学院硕士研究生。
