摘要
《说文》以“■”为“绝”字古文,其来源于战国晋系中山王器■之类字形;又以反“■”之“■”为“继”字。与《说文》相反,楚系简帛中“■”为“绝”字,反“■”之“■”为“继”字,曾侯乙墓简中多见的“■聂”可读作“麂摄”。战国时期,字形■在楚系文字内部不相混淆,在不同系别文字之间,由于字形与字种关系的不统一而产生混淆现象,传世文献■相混源于此。
“■”is the ancient form of“绝”in Shuoren(《说文》),which originated from the glyphs that similiar with“■”on Jin Dynasty Zhongshan Wangqi of the War-ring States;it also uses“■”which is the inverse form“■”as“继”.Contrary to Shuowen(《说文》),“■”on the Chu Bamboo Slips and Silks is the word“绝”,and the.“■”which is the inverse form of“■”is“继”,in Zenghouyi tomb the word“■聂”which usually be seen was read as“麂摄”.During the Warring States Period,the glyph“■”and“■”were not confused in the Chu scripts,among the characters of different famnilies,due to the inconsistency of the corresponding relationship between the font and the type,the confusion occurred.The handed down documents“■”and“■”were mixed.
作者
俞绍宏
孙振凯
Yu Shaol hong;Sun Zhenkai
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“楚系简帛文字职用研究与字词合编”(批准号:20&ZD310)的阶段性成果
关键词
楚简
继
绝
Chu Bamboo Slips
Ji(继)
Jue(绝)
