摘要
目的:比较单导联人工智能心电检测设备和传统多导联心电检测设备在常见心律失常检测中的效果。方法:随机选取心血管内科门诊及入院心悸患者152例,排除禁忌后按临床检查需要同时佩戴单导联人工智能心电检测仪与传统多导联心电检测仪不少于22 h。结果:两组仪器对总心搏数、平均心率、最小心率、房性早搏、室性早搏、房性心动过速检测数值采用配对t检验,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:单导联人工智能心电检测仪与传统多导联心电检测仪在心电记录及判读方面具有相同效果,且具备低成本、易使用、人工智能读图等优势,对心律失常筛查及诊断具有重要价值。
Objective:This study aims to compare the efficiency of ECG diagnosis with single lead artificial intelligence electrocardiography and with traditional Holter.Methods:A total of 152 patients were randomly selected.After elimination of contraindication,they were required to wear single lead artificial intelligent electrocardiograph and traditional multi-lead electrocardiograph for no less than 22 hours according to the clinical examination requirements.Results:There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the total number of cardiac beats,average heart rate,minimum heart rate,atrial premature beats,ventricular premature beats and atrial tachycardia measured by unpaired t test(P>0.05).Conclusion:Single-lead artificial electrocardiograph has the same effect as traditional multi-lead electrocardiograph in the recording and interpretation of heart rate.Single-lead artificial electrocardiograph has advantages of low lost,easy to use,artificial intelligence and so on,and it has important value for screening and diagnosis of arrhythmia.
作者
唐春平
韩笑
王俊宏
周宁天
TANG Chunping;HAN Xiao;WANG Junhong;ZHOU Ningtian(Department of Cardiology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing 210029,China)
出处
《南京医科大学学报（自然科学版）》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2020年第12期1800-1803,1808,共5页
Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Natural Sciences)
基金
江苏省卫计委开放课题(x201829)
国家自然科学基金面上项目(81570328)
作者简介
通信作者:周宁天,E⁃mail:callsky1986@aliyun.com
