印地语反语的构成手段及语用功能研究

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要反语是一种常见的语言现象,指说话人所说的话在表面上与他想要表达的意义极其不同或恰恰相反。反语不仅在印地语诗歌、小说、戏剧等文学体裁中充分展现了它的艺术表现力,而且在日常交际中也发挥着各种各样的作用。本文选取印地语反语作为研究对象,试图从印地语反语的构成手段及语用功能角度对其进行梳理总结。

作者燕燕

机构地区西安外国语大学

出处《文化创新比较研究》 2020年第3期89-91,共3页 Comparative Study of Cultural Innovation

关键词印地语反语构成手段语用功能

作者简介燕燕(1995.08—),女,陕西渭南人,硕士在读,研究方向:印度语言文学

参考文献3

1[1]Booth, W. C. A Rhetoric Of Irony [M]. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1974.
2[2]Gibbs, R. W. (JR.). "Process and products in making sense of tropes" [A]. In Ortony. 2nd (ed.). Metaphor and Thought [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1993.
3[3]Grice, P. H. "Logic and conversation" [A]. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics [C],Vol. 3: 9: Speech Acts, 41～58. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
4[4]G rice, P. H. "Further notes on logic and conversation"[A]. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics [C], Vol. 3: 9: Pragmatics, 113～128. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
5[5]Leech, G. Piciples of pragmatics [M]. London and NewYork: Longman Group Limited, 1983.
6[6]Muecke, D. The Compass of irony [M].London: Methuen, 1969.
7[7]Searle, J. R. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of SpeechActs [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 1979.
8[8]SETO, KEN- ICHI. "On non-echoic irony" [A]. In Carston R. & Uchida S. (ed.). Relevance Theory. Applications and Implications [C]. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1998.
9[9]Sperber, D. & Deirdre Wilson. "Irony and the use-mention disinction" [A]. In Cole P. (ed.). RadicalPragmatics [C]. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
10[10]Sperber, D. & Deirdre Wilson. Relevance: Communication and cognition [M]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers,1986/1995.

文化创新比较研究

2020年第3期

内容加载中请稍等...