1Taraborelli D. ft peer review. Social software and distributed scientific evaluation [ EB/OL ] . [ 2011-12-9 ] . http:// eprints, ucl. ac. uk/8279/.
2Editor from Nature. Quality and value: Models of quality control for scientific research [ EB/OL]. [ 2011-12-9 ]. http://www, nature, com/nature/peerreview/debate/ nature05031, html.
3Priem J, Hemminger B M. Scientometrics 2. 0 : Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social web [ EB/OL ]. [ 2011-12-9 ]. http ://www. uic. edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin,/ ojs/index, php/fm/article/viewArticle/2874/2570.
4Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, et al. Air-metrics : A manifesto[ EB/OL]. [2011-12-9]. http://altmetrics. org/manifesto.
5Jensen M. Authority 3.0: Friend or Foe to Scholars? [EB/ OL]. [ 2011-12-9 ]. http://utpjoumals, metapress, com/ content/14132v164q747147/.
6Patterson M. Article-level metrics at PLoS-addition of usage data[ EB/OL]. [ 2011-12-9 ]. http://blogs, plos org/plos/2OO9/O9/article-level-metfics-at-plos-addition- of-usage-data/.
7Neylon C, Wu S. Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact [ EB/OL ]. [ 2011-12-9 ]. http:/! www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC2768794/ pd/ pbio. 1000242. pdf/? tool = pmcentrez.
8Cheverie J F, Boettcher J, Buschman J. Digital scholarship inthe university tenure and promotion process: A report on the sixth scholarly communication symposium at Georgetown University Library [ J ]. Journal of Scholarly Publishing,2009. 40(3) :219-230..
9Anderson K. The impact factor: A too| from a bygone era? [ EB/OL ]. [ 2011-12-9 ]. http://scholarlykitchen. sspnet, org/2009/06/29/is-the-impact-factor-from-a- bvzone-era/.
10Wardle D A. Do ' Faculty of 1000' (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact? [ J ] .Ideas in Ecology and Evolution,2010,3 ( 1 ) : 11-15.
