摘要
众所周知,剃发留辫为满人习俗,随着统一全国进程的发展,将剃发习俗推行至中原汉地及部分边疆地区,历时整个清代而不废。但是,鱼宏亮先生最近撰文指出,根据故宫博物院收藏的康、雍、乾时期宫廷画师所绘制的皇帝、后妃、侍从的常服画像,以及外国使节所带画师所描绘的清朝官、民画像,"剃发易服"在清代并不是一个严格的限制性法令。这一结论看似具有颠覆性,但该文的史料运用、逻辑论证都存在较大瑕疵,因而结论不能成立。只要综合利用、科学解读相关满汉文档案文献及图像史料,便可还原清代剃发政策实施的历史真相。
As is well known,shaving hair and keeping braids were a kind of Manchu custom.With the development of the national unification process,Haircut Policy was introduced to the Han region and some border areas,which lasted throughout the whole Qing Period.However,Mr.Yu Hongliang recently wrote that according to the portraits of emperors,concubines,and attendants drawn by court painters during the Kangxi,Yongzheng,and Qianlong periods collected in the Palace Museum,as well as portraits drawn by foreign painters,Haircut Policy was not a strict restrictive law during the Qing Dynasty.This conclusion seemed to be subversive,but the use of historical documents and logical argumentation of the article had major flaws,so the conclusion could not be established.According to Manchu-Chinese archives and historical images,we could restore the historical truth of the Haircut Policy.
出处
《清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第3期72-89,207,共19页
Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
中国博士后科学基金会第68批面上资助项目(2020M680796)
