期刊文献+

重度盆腔器官脱垂患者治疗选择及影响因素 被引量:3

Influencing factors of the choice of treatment for patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨影响重度盆腔器官脱垂患者选择治疗方式的相关因素。方法 选取2020年12月至2022年3月期间因重度盆腔器官脱垂就诊的患者为研究对象(n=145),根据患者意愿分为手术组(n=78)和子宫托组(n=67)。比较两组一般临床资料、自我身体形象评价量表(MBIS)评分及盆底障碍量表简表(PFDI-20)评分,采用单因素分析和二分类Logistic回归分析探讨影响重度盆腔器官脱垂患者选择治疗方式的相关因素。结果 手术组与子宫托组比较,体质量指数(BMI)、就诊年龄、患病年限、中盆腔器官脱垂定量分期、合并症、MBIS评分及泌尿生殖影响量表简表(UDI-6)评分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001,P=0.036,P<0.001,P<0.001,P=0.005,P<0.001,P<0.001)。Logistic回归多因素分析显示,就诊年龄、患病年限、中盆腔器官脱垂定量分期、合并多种内科疾病、MBIS评分及UDI-6评分为重度盆腔器官脱垂患者选择不同治疗方式的独立影响因素(P=0.006,P=0.005,P=0.019,P=0.009,P=0.001,P=0.023)。结论 就诊年龄较大、患病年限较长、中盆腔器官脱垂分期较高、自我身体形象评价较低以及下尿路症状明显的患者更倾向于选择手术治疗,而合并多种内科疾病的患者通常选择子宫托治疗。 Objective To explore factors influencing the selection of treatment strategy for patients with severe pelvic organ prolapse(POP). Methods A total of 145 patients with severe POP treated during Dec. 2020 and Mar. 2022 were selected and divided into the surgical group(n=78) and pessary group(n=67) according to the treatment strategy. The general information, scores of the modified body self-image scale(MBIS), scores of pelvic floor distress inventory short form(PFDI-20), and scores of urogenital distress inventory short form(UDI-6) were compared between the two groups. Factors influencing the selection of treatment strategies were analyzed with univariate and binary Logistic regression analyses. Results Statistically significant differences were found in body mass index(BMI), age of initial visit, course of illness, mid-pelvic POP-Q stage, complications, MBIS scores and UDI-6 scores between the two groups(P<0.001, P=0.036, P<0.001, P<0.001, P=0.005, P<0.001, P<0.001). Logistic regression showed that age of initial visit, course of illness, mid-pelvic POP-Q stage, complications, MBIS scores and UDI-6 scores were independent factors influencing the choice of different treatment modalities(P=0.006, P=0.005, P=0.019, P=0.009, P=0.001, P=0.023). Conclusion Patients who visit the clinic at an older age, have a long course of disease, severer mid-pelvic POP-Q stage, lower MBIS scores and lower urinary tract symptoms are more likely to choose surgery, while patients complicated with other diseases like to choose pessary.
作者 靳鲁珺 林雪艳 刘天航 李青 李晓文 房蕾 孙浩 田永杰 JIN Lujun;LIN Xueyan;LIU Tianhang;LI Qing;LI Xiaowen;FANG Lei;SUN Hao;TIAN Yongjie(Department of Gynecology,Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University,Jinan 250021,Shandong,China;Cheello College of Medicine,Shandong University,Jinan 250012,Shandong,China)
出处 《山东大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第12期39-43,57,共6页 Journal of Shandong University:Health Sciences
基金 中华预防医学会科研资金支持项目(201815072)
关键词 重度盆腔器官脱垂 手术治疗 子宫托治疗 相关因素 Severe pelvic organ prolapse Surgical treatment Pessary treatment Influencing factors
作者简介 通信作者:田永杰。E-mail:tianyongjie@sdu.edu.cn
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献99

  • 1朱兰,郎景和,王文艳.保留子宫的子宫脱垂矫正新术式——子宫骶骨固定术[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(11):697-698. 被引量:22
  • 2Barber MD, Walter MD, Cundiff GW, et al. Responsiveness of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory(PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire(PFIQ) in women undergoing vaginal surgery and pessary tretment for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 194 : 1492-1498.
  • 3Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, et al. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003,189:1551-1558.
  • 4Avery KN, Bosch JL, Gotoh M, et al. Questionnaires to assess urinary and anal incontinence: review and recommendations. J Urol, 2007, 177:39-49.
  • 5Tubaro A, Zattoni F, Prezioso D, et al. Italian validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaires. BJU Int, 2006,97 : 101-108.
  • 6Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdanian M, et al. The Short Form Health Survey ( SF-36 ) : translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res, 2005,14:875-882.
  • 7Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5 D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med, 2001,33:337-343.
  • 8Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Summers KH, et al. Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence:cross-cultural performance of 15 language versions of the I-QOL Qual Life Res, 2005,14: 1901- 1913.
  • 9Nojomi M, Baharvand P, Moradi lakeh M, et al. Incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL) : translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunet, 2009,20:575-579.
  • 10Ross S, Soroka D, Karahalios A, et al. Incontinence specific quality of life measures used in trials of treatments for female urinary incontinence: a systemic review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2006,17:272-285.

共引文献180

同被引文献50

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部