期刊文献+

明代官员乘轿风尚论析 被引量:1

An Analysis of Officials’Sedan Chair Custom in the Ming Dynasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 明代对官员乘轿定有严格的等级规制,但随着乘轿风尚逐渐盛行,明廷曾一度通过惩罚违制与申明禁令的方式来抑制乘轿之风,却收效甚微,始终没有控制住乘轿之风的蔓延。明廷三番五次的乘轿禁令正是风尚与违制的映射,到明中后期,由乘轿而引起的僭越礼制愈演愈烈,明廷并无有效的应对措施。于制度之外发展出一种破例恩赐乘轿的灵活处理方式,终究未形成正式制度。此外,乘轿风尚的发展还带来许多负面影响。 In the Ming Dynasty,there was a strict hierarchy for the officials to take the sedan chair.However,as time passed,the style of the sedan chair was gradually prevailing.The government of the Ming Dynasty once suppressed the custom of the sedan chair by punishing the violation and emphasizing the prohibition,but with little success,and there was no control over the spread of the custom.The repeated prohibition from the Ming Dynasty was exactly one mapping of violation and prohibition.In the middle and late Ming Dynasty,the arrogation of etiquette caused by the sedan chair has intensified,but the government of the Ming Dynasty had no effective countermeasures.Outside the system,an unconventional award had been given to the flexible handling of the sedan system.After all,no formal system has been formed.In addition,the development of the sedan custom had also brought many negative effects.
作者 龚世豪 Gong Shihao(School of History of Wuhan University)
出处 《中国社会历史评论》 2019年第2期60-70,248,共12页 Chinese Social History Review
关键词 明代 乘轿风尚 乘轿制度 官员 the Ming Dynasty Sedan Chair Custom Sedan system Officials
作者简介 龚世豪,武汉大学历史学院博士研究生。
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1钞晓鸿.近二十年来有关明清“奢靡”之风研究述评[J].中国史研究动态,2001(10):9-20. 被引量:21
  • 2[2]明太祖实录:卷34[M].台北:台北中央研究院校勘本,1962.
  • 3[3][明]余继登.典故纪闻:卷3[M].北京:中华书局,1997:45.
  • 4[4][清]张廷玉,等.明史:卷65[M].北京:中华书局,1995.
  • 5[5][明]李东阳,等.明会典:卷59[M].上海:上海古籍四库全书,1987.
  • 6[6][明]李东阳,等.明会典:卷56[M].上海:上海古籍四库全书,1987.
  • 7[7][明]张萱.西园闻见录:卷72[M].上海:上海古籍续修四库全书,2002.
  • 8[8][明]余继登.典故纪闻:卷5[M].北京:中华书局,1997:84.
  • 9[9][明]余继登.典故纪闻:卷10[M].北京:中华书局,1997:178.
  • 10[10][明]陆容.菽园杂记:卷11[M].北京:中华书局,1997:132.

共引文献4

同被引文献9

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部