摘要
“辩证逻辑”究竟是不是“逻辑”,一直都是一个极富争议的命题。为了回答该问题,首先应该界定清楚何为“逻辑”。在严格给出“逻辑”的广义与狭义定义之后,即可对繁复的辩证逻辑研究成果进行更为准确的分辨。根据“逻辑”的广义定义,辩证逻辑名下“作为逻辑的辩证法”不是逻辑;而辩证逻辑名下的进行“逻辑”研究的辩证逻辑是逻辑。然而,在这些属于广义逻辑的辩证逻辑中,如果按照狭义定义的标准去衡量,有些看上去是逻辑的辩证逻辑却不是逻辑。因此,基于严格定义基础上的细致分辨可见,在现阶段断言辩证逻辑“是哲学”、“是逻辑”皆因笼统作答而十分不当;只有对笼统断言做出进一步限制并明确给出其断言之依据,方可得到具有较高可接受性的答案。此外,作为逻辑的辩证逻辑在符号语言的制定、形式结构的刻画、核心理论的构建和基本构建原则等方面,也的确存在着可以进一步研究和发展的空间。
Whether‘dialectical logic’is‘logic’or not has always been a highly controversial proposition.To clarify this problem,we should first define clearly what‘logic’is.After giving the broad and narrow definitions of‘logic’strictly,we can reasonably distinguish the numerous and rich research achievements of dialectical logic.According to the broad definition of logic,‘dialectics as logic’under the name of dialectical logic is not logic,but the dialectical logics under the name of dialectical logic carried on logical study are logic.In these dialectical logics which are logic,if measured by a narrow definition,some dialectical logics which clearly appear to be logic are not logic.Based on fine distinction,it can be found that it is improper to assert that dialectical logic is‘philosophy’,or‘logic’;only when it is further restricted and specific criteria are given,can the answer with higher acceptability be obtained.
出处
《思想与文化》
2022年第1期117-129,共13页
Thought & Culture
基金
国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“广义逻辑悖论的历史发展、理论前沿与跨学科应用研究”(项目编号:18ZDA031)
作者简介
郝旭东(1974—),山东莘县人,华东师范大学哲学系副教授,研究领域为现代逻辑和逻辑哲学。
