摘要
临时措施是国际体育仲裁中的重要机制,在体育争议当事人之间发挥着利益平衡的支点作用。CAS《体育仲裁法典》第R37条就授予临时措施的条件作了大致规定,不过在临时措施的实体性适用条件、类型和可执行性方面仍需进一步明确。通过分析CAS案例、瑞士法等可以确定:首先,在实体性适用条件中,“不可弥补的损害”不限于金钱性损害,“实体胜诉的可能性”应是看似合理的较低证明标准,“利益的平衡”则要求适当地保障他方当事人的合法权利,三个要素不必在所有情形下同时满足;其次,CAS仲裁庭有权依据个案情形授予不同类型的临时措施,但应受限于当事人的协议和瑞士强制性规范;最后,CAS临时措施可依申请获得瑞士法院的协助执行,在其他国家则存在不确定性。未来中国制定体育仲裁规则临时措施条款应当吸收CAS的有益经验。
Interim measure is an important mechanism in international sports arbitration,which plays as a pivot of interest balance between parties of sports dispute.The Article R37of CAS Code of Sports-Related Arbitration has provided a incomplete rules of conditions for granting interim measure,but the interim measure’s substantive applicable standard,genre and enforceability are still vague.By analysis of the CAS arbitral practices and the law of Switzerland etc.,it can be concluded that,firstly for the substantive conditions,the irreparable harm cannot be limited to monetary harm,the likelihood of success in merits should be a low burden proof as plausibility test,balance of interest requires appropriate guarantee of the opposing party’s legal rights and the abovementioned elements do not need to satisfy cumulatively.Secondly,CAS arbitral tribunal has discretion to grant diverse types of interim measure in light of the particular circumstance,but should be subject to parties’agreement and mandatory rules of Switzerland.Lastly,the execution of CAS interim measure can be assisted by the court of Switzerland upon the application of party concerned,but whether it can be enforced in other countries is uncertain.In future,China should absorb the CAS beneficial experience in adopting the interim measures clause of sports arbitration rules.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2022年第3期5-16,共12页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
基金
浙江工商大学科研启动经费(项目编号:No.1100XJ2321076)资助
关键词
临时措施
国际体育仲裁
CAS《体育仲裁法典》
保全措施
interim measure
international sports arbitration
CAS Code of Sports-related Arbitration
conservatory measure
作者简介
桑远棵,浙江工商大学法学院讲师
