摘要
《布拉格规则》主要在文件披露,证人数量、证人盘问以及专家证人,仲裁庭的主导作用与仲裁员知法三大方面有所革新。然而,在国际商事仲裁的大环境下,究竟是否需要独立设置这样一套规则仍待考证。《布拉格规则》在规范目的中含糊公平要素,在适用范围上偏向大陆法系背景当事人;其主要内容的革新也只是在《IBA规则》基础上的删减;此外,软法的灵活性本身就赋予当事人灵活的选择权。综上所述,本文对《布拉格规则》独立存在的必要性提出质疑。
The advent of the Prague Rules set off a debate in the field of international commercial arbitration.This set of rules with characteristics of civil law is mainly in the disclosure of documents,the number of witnesses,witness cross-examination and expert witnesses,the leading role of the arbitral tribunal and Jura Novit Curia.However,in the context of international commercial arbitration,whether or not it is necessary to set such a set of rules independently remains to be verified.This article argues that the"Prague Rules"are vague and fair in the normative purpose,and there is no doubt that the scope of application is based towards the background legal background parties;the so-called main content innovation is basically based on the"IBA Rules";the flexibility of soft law itself gives the parties a flexible choice and greatly promotes autonomy of meaning.Based on the foregoing perspective,this article will question the necessity of the independent existence of the Prague Rules.
出处
《仲裁研究》
2020年第2期13-21,共9页
Arbitration Study
关键词
《布拉格规则》
国际商事仲裁规则
软法
独立存在必要性
Prague Rules
International commercial arbitration rule
Soft law
Necessity of independent existence
作者简介
戚咪娜,上海对外经贸大学2018級国际法硕士研究生。
