摘要
章学诚方志学理论及其纂修《湖北通志》的实践对清中期以来湖北方志编纂产生了重要影响。伴随新思想传入,晚清时期方志编纂发生诸多变化,这些变化通常被视为近代方志转型的前奏。在该背景下,清末围绕着《湖北通志》的纂修问题出现了主新派和主旧派的争论。通志纂修以县志编纂为基础,通志纂修的争论往往在县志编纂中有集中的表现。光绪二年(1876)和光绪八年两版《麻城县志》在编纂理念、编排方式和部分内容上的差异可以视为是这一时期相关变化、争论和分歧的缩影。通过对两版县志编纂差异的考察,将有助于我们理解清末方志编纂者如何对新、旧派理论进行调和,亦可以为我们分析晚清民国时期方志学转型问题提供案例和线索。
Zhang Xuecheng’s theories on local records studies and his practice of compiling Hubei General Records have had profound influences on Hubei local records compilation since mid-Qing Dynasty.Along with the introduction of new thoughts,various changes occurred in local records compilation in late Qing Dynasty,which are generally seen as the prelude to the transformation of modern period local records.Against this background,disputes over the compilation of Hubei General Records emerged between the new and old schools at the end of the Qing Dynasty.Since general records compilation was generally based on county records compilation,such disputes over general records compilation were often closely reflected in county records compilation.The differences between two versions of Macheng County Records compiled in the second year of Guangxu(1876)and the eighth year of Guangxu(1882)respectively in idea,style and content,can be regarded as the embodiment of the changes,disputes and divergences during this period.A survey of the compilation differences between these two versions of county records is rather helpful to our understanding of how late Qing Dynasty local records compilers reconciled the theories of the new and old schools,and will provide us with cases and clues for the issue of the transformation of local records studies in late Qing Dynasty.
出处
《中国地方志》
2021年第2期43-51,125,共10页
China Local Records
