Background Hyperprolactinaemia is a common adverse effect of antipsychotics （APs）. The results of Peony-Glycyrrhiza decoction （PGD） as a potentially useful adjunctivetreatment for hyperprolactinaemia are inconsis...Background Hyperprolactinaemia is a common adverse effect of antipsychotics （APs）. The results of Peony-Glycyrrhiza decoction （PGD） as a potentially useful adjunctivetreatment for hyperprolactinaemia are inconsistent.Aim This meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials （RCTs） examined the effcacy and safety of adjunctive PGDtherapy for AP-induced hyperprolactinaemia.Methods English （PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO） and Chinese （Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data） databases were systematicallysearched up to 10 June 2018. The inclusion criteria were based on PICOS-Participants： adult patients with schizophrenia; Intervention： PGD plus APs; Comparison： APs plus placebo or AP monotherapy; Outcomes： effcacy and safety; Study design： RCTs. The weighted mean difference （WMD） and risk ratio （RR） along with their 95% CIs were calculated using Review Manager （RevMan） V.5.3 software.Results Five RCTs （n=450） were included and analysed. Two RCTs （n=140） were double-blind and four RCTs （n=409） reported ‘random’ assignment with specifc description. The PGD group showed a signifcantly lower serum prolactin level at endpoint than the control group （n=380, WMD： ？32.69 ng/mL （95% CI -41.66 to 23.72）, p〈0.00001, I2=97%）. Similarly, the superiority of PGD over the control groups was also found in the improvement of hyperprolactinaemia-related symptoms. No difference was found in the improvement of psychiatric symptoms assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale （n=403, WMD： -0.62 （95% CI -2.38 to 1.15）, p=0.49, I^2=0%）. There were similar rates of all-cause discontinuation （n=330, RR 0.93 （95% CI 0.63 to 1.37）, p=0.71, I^2=0%） and adverse drug reactions between the two groups. According to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the level of evidence of primary and secondary outcomes ranged from ‘very low’ （14.3%）, ‘low’ （42.8%）, ‘moderate’ （14.3%）, to ‘high’ （28.6%）.Conclusions Current evidence supports the adjunctive use of PGD to suppress elevated prolactin and improve prolactin-induced symptoms without signifcant adverse events in adult patients with AP-induced hyperprolactinaemia. High-quality RCTs with longer duration are needed to confrm these fndings.展开更多
背景:躁动在精神分裂症治疗中是一个重大挑战。电休克疗法(ECT)对各种精神疾病是一种快速、有效、和安全的治疗,但ECT对精神分裂症的躁动治疗的相关meta分析还尚未报道。目标:系统地评估单一使用ECT或ECT合并使用其他抗精神病药物(APs)...背景:躁动在精神分裂症治疗中是一个重大挑战。电休克疗法(ECT)对各种精神疾病是一种快速、有效、和安全的治疗,但ECT对精神分裂症的躁动治疗的相关meta分析还尚未报道。目标:系统地评估单一使用ECT或ECT合并使用其他抗精神病药物(APs)的对精神分裂症的躁动治疗的有效性和安全性。方法:进行随机对照试验(RCT)的系统文献搜索。两名独立评估者筛选研究、提取结果数据与现有数据的安全性、进行质量评估和数据合成。采用建议、评估、开发、和评价的工作组等级(GRADE)来判断主要成果的证据的总体水平。结果:一共确定了中国有七个RCTs,包括ECT单一使用(4个RCTs有5个治疗组,n=240)和ECT-APs合并使用(3个RCTs,n=240)。研究对象平均年龄34.3(4.5)岁,平均治疗时间为4.3(3.1)周。所有7个RCTs非盲法,并且根据Jadad量表7项RCTs均被评为低质量。样本的Meta分析发现与APs单一治疗相比,单一使用ECT或ECT-APs合并使用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)的躁动子因子评分改善均无显著性差异(ECT单一使用:weighted mean difference(WMD)=-0.90,95%confidence interval(CI):(-2.91,1.11),p=0.38;ECT-APs合并使用:WMD=-1.34,(95%CI:-4.07,1.39),p=0.33)。然而,PANSS总分(WMD=-7.13,I^2=0%,p=0.004)和兴奋子因子评分(WMD=-1.97,p<0.0001)、ECT治疗14天后的PANSS总分(WMD=-7.13,I^2=0%,p=0.004)和第7天和第14天的兴奋子因子评分(WMD=-1.97to-1.92,p=0.002 to 0.0001)均显示单一使用ECT优于APs单一治疗。ECT-APs合并治疗结束时(WMD=-10.40,p=0.03)和治疗后7天(WMD=-5.01,p=0.02)的PANSS总分显示均优于APs单药治疗。头痛(p=0.0001,number-needed-to-harm(NNH)=3,95%CI=2-4)是唯一的ECT单一治疗后不良反应,并且ECT单一治疗组比APs单药治疗发生的更频繁。根据GRADE方法,主要结果的证据水平被评为"非常低"(37.5%)和"低"(50%)。结论:基于中国7个RCTs合并的数据发现ECT单一治疗或ECT-APs合并治疗在精神分裂症患者的躁动治疗中并没有优势。然而,ECT单一治疗或ECT-APs合并治疗均与PANSS总分减低显著有关。需要高质量的RCTs验证目前的解释。展开更多
The draft National Mental Health Law of China was released for public consultations on June 10,2011 [1].Following wide-ranging public consultations,the draft was further amended by the Standing Committee of the Nation...The draft National Mental Health Law of China was released for public consultations on June 10,2011 [1].Following wide-ranging public consultations,the draft was further amended by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on October 24,2011 [2,3].Although the penultimate draft has been finalized,there are continuous debates and concerns about its potential negative effects on mental health services in China.The article in this issue of the Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry by Professor Xie [4] argues that the proposed law over-emphasizes patient’s self-sufficiency and,thus,neglects traditional Chinese culture。展开更多
Background Smoking is a serious public health problem. Patients with schizophrenia usually have a higher prevalence of smoking than the general population, but the level of nicotine dependence is seldom studied, espec...Background Smoking is a serious public health problem. Patients with schizophrenia usually have a higher prevalence of smoking than the general population, but the level of nicotine dependence is seldom studied, especially for patients living in the communities. Aims This study aimed to examine the level of nicotine dependence in Chinese community-dwelling patients with schizophrenia and explored its associated sociodemographic and clinical factors. Methods A total of 621 patients with schizophrenia treated in the primary care centres of Guangzhou were consecutively recruited. The level of nicotine dependence was assessed with the Chinese version of the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). Results 148 patients with schizophrenia were current smokers, and the mean (SD) score of FTND was 5.06 (2.55) for all the current smokers. The prevalence of nicotine addiction was 48.0%(95% Cl: 40.0%-56.0%) in patients with current smoking. The patients with schizophrenia had a significantly higher level of nicotine dependence than the Chinese general population. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that male gender, being unemployed, having a family history of psychiatric disorders, having major medical conditions, first illness episode and less severe positive symptoms were significantly associated with a higher level of nicotine dependence. Conclusion Community-dwelling patients with schizophrenia in China, especially male patients, had a higher level of nicotine dependence than the general population.展开更多
基金supported by the University of Macao(SRG2014-00019-FHSMYRG2015-00230 FHS+4 种基金MYRG2016-00005-FHS)the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University(2016YFC0906302816713342014Y2-001052015BAI13B02)
文摘Background Hyperprolactinaemia is a common adverse effect of antipsychotics （APs）. The results of Peony-Glycyrrhiza decoction （PGD） as a potentially useful adjunctivetreatment for hyperprolactinaemia are inconsistent.Aim This meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials （RCTs） examined the effcacy and safety of adjunctive PGDtherapy for AP-induced hyperprolactinaemia.Methods English （PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO） and Chinese （Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data） databases were systematicallysearched up to 10 June 2018. The inclusion criteria were based on PICOS-Participants： adult patients with schizophrenia; Intervention： PGD plus APs; Comparison： APs plus placebo or AP monotherapy; Outcomes： effcacy and safety; Study design： RCTs. The weighted mean difference （WMD） and risk ratio （RR） along with their 95% CIs were calculated using Review Manager （RevMan） V.5.3 software.Results Five RCTs （n=450） were included and analysed. Two RCTs （n=140） were double-blind and four RCTs （n=409） reported ‘random’ assignment with specifc description. The PGD group showed a signifcantly lower serum prolactin level at endpoint than the control group （n=380, WMD： ？32.69 ng/mL （95% CI -41.66 to 23.72）, p〈0.00001, I2=97%）. Similarly, the superiority of PGD over the control groups was also found in the improvement of hyperprolactinaemia-related symptoms. No difference was found in the improvement of psychiatric symptoms assessed by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale （n=403, WMD： -0.62 （95% CI -2.38 to 1.15）, p=0.49, I^2=0%）. There were similar rates of all-cause discontinuation （n=330, RR 0.93 （95% CI 0.63 to 1.37）, p=0.71, I^2=0%） and adverse drug reactions between the two groups. According to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the level of evidence of primary and secondary outcomes ranged from ‘very low’ （14.3%）, ‘low’ （42.8%）, ‘moderate’ （14.3%）, to ‘high’ （28.6%）.Conclusions Current evidence supports the adjunctive use of PGD to suppress elevated prolactin and improve prolactin-induced symptoms without signifcant adverse events in adult patients with AP-induced hyperprolactinaemia. High-quality RCTs with longer duration are needed to confrm these fndings.
基金supported by the University of Macao(SRG2014-00019-FHSMYRG2015-00230-FHS+4 种基金MYRG2016-00005-FHS)the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University(2016YFC0906302816713342014Y2-001052015BAI13B02)
文摘背景:迟发性运动障碍(TD)的临床特征是异常不自主运动。TD具有严重的不可逆的致残性和社会功能损害。目的 :此荟萃分析基于随机对照试验(RCTs)文献系统评估褪黑素对精神分裂症患者迟发性运动障碍的临床疗效和安全性。方法 :两位独立评估者从以下数据库对相关的临床随机对照试验(RCT)文献进行检索(万方数据、中国知网(CNKI)、中国生物医学文摘数据库和PubM ed、PsycI NFO、Embase、Cochrane Library数据库),检索时间截止于2017年6月8日。以TD症状严重程度为主要结局指标,采用Rev Man 5.3版本进行统计分析,对RCTs的质量评估采用Cochrane风险评估偏倚和Jadad量表来评估各种偏倚的风险性。采用GRADE(Grades of Recommendation,Assessment,Development,and Evaluation)系统推荐分级方法对meta-分析结果的整体证据质量水平进行分级评价。结果 :最终筛选确定4个RCTs(n=130)。3个RCTs采用双盲法,1个RCT单盲,根据Cochrane风险评估偏倚和Jadad量表显示3个RCTs的疗效评估指标的证据质量被评定为"高质量"。与对照组相比,根据不自主运动量表(AIMS)评定褪黑素可改善TD严重程度(4个RCTs,n=130,加权平均差值(WMD):-1.52(95%CI:-3.24,0.20),p=0.08;I2=0%),但尚没有达到显著差异。根据等级方法,改善TD症状的meta分析结果的整体证据质量被评为"低",而关于不良反应和认知损害方面则数据太少。结论 :荟萃分析表明,褪黑素或可改善精神分裂症TD症状。但仍有待今后更高质量和更大样本的RCTs验证。
基金supported by the Base to Clinical and Scientific Research Cooperation fund of Capital Medical University(15JL67)the High-tech personnel training grant from Beijing Health System(2015-3-104)the Beijing municipal education commission on science and technology plan projects(KM201610025021)
基金supported by the Start-Up Research Grant(SRG2014-00019-FHS)the Multi-Year Research Grant(MYRG2015-00230-FHS)from the University of Macao
文摘背景:躁动在精神分裂症治疗中是一个重大挑战。电休克疗法(ECT)对各种精神疾病是一种快速、有效、和安全的治疗,但ECT对精神分裂症的躁动治疗的相关meta分析还尚未报道。目标:系统地评估单一使用ECT或ECT合并使用其他抗精神病药物(APs)的对精神分裂症的躁动治疗的有效性和安全性。方法:进行随机对照试验(RCT)的系统文献搜索。两名独立评估者筛选研究、提取结果数据与现有数据的安全性、进行质量评估和数据合成。采用建议、评估、开发、和评价的工作组等级(GRADE)来判断主要成果的证据的总体水平。结果:一共确定了中国有七个RCTs,包括ECT单一使用(4个RCTs有5个治疗组,n=240)和ECT-APs合并使用(3个RCTs,n=240)。研究对象平均年龄34.3(4.5)岁,平均治疗时间为4.3(3.1)周。所有7个RCTs非盲法,并且根据Jadad量表7项RCTs均被评为低质量。样本的Meta分析发现与APs单一治疗相比,单一使用ECT或ECT-APs合并使用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)的躁动子因子评分改善均无显著性差异(ECT单一使用:weighted mean difference(WMD)=-0.90,95%confidence interval(CI):(-2.91,1.11),p=0.38;ECT-APs合并使用:WMD=-1.34,(95%CI:-4.07,1.39),p=0.33)。然而,PANSS总分(WMD=-7.13,I^2=0%,p=0.004)和兴奋子因子评分(WMD=-1.97,p<0.0001)、ECT治疗14天后的PANSS总分(WMD=-7.13,I^2=0%,p=0.004)和第7天和第14天的兴奋子因子评分(WMD=-1.97to-1.92,p=0.002 to 0.0001)均显示单一使用ECT优于APs单一治疗。ECT-APs合并治疗结束时(WMD=-10.40,p=0.03)和治疗后7天(WMD=-5.01,p=0.02)的PANSS总分显示均优于APs单药治疗。头痛(p=0.0001,number-needed-to-harm(NNH)=3,95%CI=2-4)是唯一的ECT单一治疗后不良反应,并且ECT单一治疗组比APs单药治疗发生的更频繁。根据GRADE方法,主要结果的证据水平被评为"非常低"(37.5%)和"低"(50%)。结论:基于中国7个RCTs合并的数据发现ECT单一治疗或ECT-APs合并治疗在精神分裂症患者的躁动治疗中并没有优势。然而,ECT单一治疗或ECT-APs合并治疗均与PANSS总分减低显著有关。需要高质量的RCTs验证目前的解释。
文摘The draft National Mental Health Law of China was released for public consultations on June 10,2011 [1].Following wide-ranging public consultations,the draft was further amended by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on October 24,2011 [2,3].Although the penultimate draft has been finalized,there are continuous debates and concerns about its potential negative effects on mental health services in China.The article in this issue of the Shanghai Archives of Psychiatry by Professor Xie [4] argues that the proposed law over-emphasizes patient’s self-sufficiency and,thus,neglects traditional Chinese culture。
基金supported by the University of Macao(SRG2014-00019-FHSMYRG2015-00230-FHS+4 种基金MYRG2016-00005-FHS)the Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University(2016YFC09063022014Y2-001052015BAI13B02)Science and Technology Department of Guangdong Province major science and technology(2016B010108003)
文摘Background Smoking is a serious public health problem. Patients with schizophrenia usually have a higher prevalence of smoking than the general population, but the level of nicotine dependence is seldom studied, especially for patients living in the communities. Aims This study aimed to examine the level of nicotine dependence in Chinese community-dwelling patients with schizophrenia and explored its associated sociodemographic and clinical factors. Methods A total of 621 patients with schizophrenia treated in the primary care centres of Guangzhou were consecutively recruited. The level of nicotine dependence was assessed with the Chinese version of the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). Results 148 patients with schizophrenia were current smokers, and the mean (SD) score of FTND was 5.06 (2.55) for all the current smokers. The prevalence of nicotine addiction was 48.0%(95% Cl: 40.0%-56.0%) in patients with current smoking. The patients with schizophrenia had a significantly higher level of nicotine dependence than the Chinese general population. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that male gender, being unemployed, having a family history of psychiatric disorders, having major medical conditions, first illness episode and less severe positive symptoms were significantly associated with a higher level of nicotine dependence. Conclusion Community-dwelling patients with schizophrenia in China, especially male patients, had a higher level of nicotine dependence than the general population.
