Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the micro-dynamic pedicle screw for the prevention of loosening between the screw and bone surface in lumbar spinal fusion.For this evaluation,the peek pull-out force(PPF)...Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the micro-dynamic pedicle screw for the prevention of loosening between the screw and bone surface in lumbar spinal fusion.For this evaluation,the peek pull-out force(PPF)after fatigue resistance testing at different cycles and semidiameter of screw insertion area of micro-CT image was compared between the micro-dynamic and traditional pedicle screws.Methods Forty lumbar vertebrae received a traditional pedicle screw on one side and a micro-dynamic pedicle screw on the other side as follows:15 vertebrae underwent instant pull-out testing(group A,traditional vs.group B,micro-dynamic);15 vertebrae underwent pull-out test after 5000-cyclic fatigue loading(group C,traditional vs.group D,micro-dynamic);and 10 vertebrae underwent pull-out test after 10000-cyclic fatigue loading(group E,traditional vs.group F,micro-dynamic).All vertebrae that after fatigue loading were scanned by using micro-ct to check the semidiameter of screw insertion area.The PPF,normalized PPF(PPFn),bone mineral density(BMD)and diameter of screw insertion area were compared between all groups.Results The BMD showed a weak significant correlation with PPF(r=0.252,P=0.024).The PPF in groups A and B(P=0.485),and groups C and D(P=0.184)did not show significant difference.However,the PPF in group F was significantly greater than that measured in group E(P=0.005).The PPFn of groups A,C,and E significantly decreased as the number of cycles increased(P=0.015).Meanwhile,the PPFn of groups B,D,and F remained consistent regardless of the number of cycles(P=0.367). The semidiameter of traditional pedicle screw insertion area was significantly larger than that of micro-dynamic pedicle screw insertion area(P<0.001).Conclusions This study compared the performance of a micro-dynamic pedicle screw versus that of a traditional pedicle screw using pull-out testing and micro-CT.The results showed that the micro-dynamic pedicle screw provides similar resistance in lowcycle fatigue testing and favorable resistance in high-cycle fatigue testing versus the traditional pedicle screw.The micro-dynamic pedicle screw provides stronger fixation stability versus the traditional pedicle screw,especially in high-cyclic fatigue loading condition versus the traditional pedicle screws.展开更多
The method for pulling large diameter single crystals with the abovesaid difficulties avoided is developed.Here the free melt surface does not depend on the growing crystal diameter and remains minimal during the whol...The method for pulling large diameter single crystals with the abovesaid difficulties avoided is developed.Here the free melt surface does not depend on the growing crystal diameter and remains minimal during the whole growing process.The essence of this method is that at the stage of radial crystal growth the melt level in the crucible of a variable cross-section(for instance,in a conical crucible)is raised.展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 31670957)
文摘Objective To investigate the effectiveness of the micro-dynamic pedicle screw for the prevention of loosening between the screw and bone surface in lumbar spinal fusion.For this evaluation,the peek pull-out force(PPF)after fatigue resistance testing at different cycles and semidiameter of screw insertion area of micro-CT image was compared between the micro-dynamic and traditional pedicle screws.Methods Forty lumbar vertebrae received a traditional pedicle screw on one side and a micro-dynamic pedicle screw on the other side as follows:15 vertebrae underwent instant pull-out testing(group A,traditional vs.group B,micro-dynamic);15 vertebrae underwent pull-out test after 5000-cyclic fatigue loading(group C,traditional vs.group D,micro-dynamic);and 10 vertebrae underwent pull-out test after 10000-cyclic fatigue loading(group E,traditional vs.group F,micro-dynamic).All vertebrae that after fatigue loading were scanned by using micro-ct to check the semidiameter of screw insertion area.The PPF,normalized PPF(PPFn),bone mineral density(BMD)and diameter of screw insertion area were compared between all groups.Results The BMD showed a weak significant correlation with PPF(r=0.252,P=0.024).The PPF in groups A and B(P=0.485),and groups C and D(P=0.184)did not show significant difference.However,the PPF in group F was significantly greater than that measured in group E(P=0.005).The PPFn of groups A,C,and E significantly decreased as the number of cycles increased(P=0.015).Meanwhile,the PPFn of groups B,D,and F remained consistent regardless of the number of cycles(P=0.367). The semidiameter of traditional pedicle screw insertion area was significantly larger than that of micro-dynamic pedicle screw insertion area(P<0.001).Conclusions This study compared the performance of a micro-dynamic pedicle screw versus that of a traditional pedicle screw using pull-out testing and micro-CT.The results showed that the micro-dynamic pedicle screw provides similar resistance in lowcycle fatigue testing and favorable resistance in high-cycle fatigue testing versus the traditional pedicle screw.The micro-dynamic pedicle screw provides stronger fixation stability versus the traditional pedicle screw,especially in high-cyclic fatigue loading condition versus the traditional pedicle screws.
文摘The method for pulling large diameter single crystals with the abovesaid difficulties avoided is developed.Here the free melt surface does not depend on the growing crystal diameter and remains minimal during the whole growing process.The essence of this method is that at the stage of radial crystal growth the melt level in the crucible of a variable cross-section(for instance,in a conical crucible)is raised.
