期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
顶管工程后背受力与变形三维分析 被引量:10
1
作者 严绍军 张爱华 《煤田地质与勘探》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第1期37-40,共4页
以某顶管工程为背景,采用朗肯被动土压力理论对后背土体的承载能力进行了分析;根据弹塑性模型建立起后背结构的三维有限元模型,对后背结构与土体在顶力作用下的变形与受力过程进行分析,并同朗肯理论结果进行比较;对影响后背结构的变形... 以某顶管工程为背景,采用朗肯被动土压力理论对后背土体的承载能力进行了分析;根据弹塑性模型建立起后背结构的三维有限元模型,对后背结构与土体在顶力作用下的变形与受力过程进行分析,并同朗肯理论结果进行比较;对影响后背结构的变形各因素进行了分析;对后背结构顶力合力点的变形进行了实测,并同理论预测结果进行了对比分析,初步探讨了形成差异的主要原因。 展开更多
关键词 顶管 后背 变形 有限元
在线阅读 下载PDF
顶管矩形工作井复合式后背墙反力分布研究 被引量:21
2
作者 毛海和 《岩土力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第6期1212-1216,共5页
顶管工作井在顶进施工过程中受力复杂,主要表现在:确定千斤顶推力在内部结构、围护结构和后背墙外侧土体之间的作用力是如何传递,土体变形对墙背土体抗力发挥的影响以及其对结构内力计算分析的影响。对现有顶管工作井计算方法进行归纳... 顶管工作井在顶进施工过程中受力复杂,主要表现在:确定千斤顶推力在内部结构、围护结构和后背墙外侧土体之间的作用力是如何传递,土体变形对墙背土体抗力发挥的影响以及其对结构内力计算分析的影响。对现有顶管工作井计算方法进行归纳基础上,通过对工程算例建立数值计算模型,求证了后背墙各部分反力在宽度和深度方向上的分布规律,为探求一种合理简化更加接近实际的顶管复合式后背墙结构计算方法提供参照。 展开更多
关键词 顶管 上体变形 复合式后背墙 反力分布 平面应变 结构分析
在线阅读 下载PDF
STRUCTURAL EVOLUTION OF THE KULU-RAMPUR AND LARJI WINDOW ZONES, WESTERN HIMALAYA, INDIA
3
作者 Anand Kumar Pandey 1, N.S.Virdi 2, V.K.Gairola 3, J.P.Burg 1(1 Institute of Geology, ETH\|Zurich, 8092\|Zurich,Switzerland 2 Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun\|248001,India 3.Department of Geology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 《地学前缘》 EI CAS CSCD 2000年第S1期9-9,共1页
The Kulu\|Rampur and Larji windows in the western Himalaya make a window in window structure in the Lesser Himalaya between the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) and Main Central Thrust (MCT). The former constituted of late ... The Kulu\|Rampur and Larji windows in the western Himalaya make a window in window structure in the Lesser Himalaya between the Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) and Main Central Thrust (MCT). The former constituted of late Archean Rampur Group with middle Proterozoic intrusive Bandal Granite Complex has been thrusted on to the younger Larji Group (Riphean) along a splay thrust making the latter a window in window structure. Both the sequences have recorded multiple deformation during the Himalayan orogeny. Five sets of Himalayan structures have been recognised. The first deformation event (D 1) was responsible for large isoclinal, (recumbent) folds (F 1) which are older than the onset of Himalayan thrusting. Presently, the Rampur Group constitutes the antiform and the Larji Group occupies a synformal position of F 1 folds. The parautochthons of the window zone has been covered by the Chail and Jutogh nappes along the Chail and Jutogh thrusts during D 2. Thrusting was followed by F 3 folding during D 3 deformation. This fold can be recognised in form of Rampur Antiform and corresponding Nirath\|Pandoh Synform with NW—SE axial trend. The Chail and Jutogh nappes are folded along with the parautochthonous rocks of window zone by this folding event. The out\|of\|sequence imbrication and the splay thrusts in the hanging wall of the MBT were initiated during D 3. The F 3 are overprinted by cross folding (F 4) of D 4 deformation, which is responsible for the doubly plunging character of the window zones. Cross folding was followed by D 5 extensional faulting and collapse of the hanging wall in out\|of\|sequence shear zones. The D 5 extensional fabrics are attributed to gravity collapse in the hanging wall of the MBT. 展开更多
关键词 TECTONIC windows HIMALAYAN deformation MBT HANGING wall splay thrust
在线阅读 下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部