Kernal factor analysis （KFA） with vafimax was proposed by using Mercer kernel function which can map the data in the original space to a high-dimensional feature space, and was compared with the kernel principle com...Kernal factor analysis （KFA） with vafimax was proposed by using Mercer kernel function which can map the data in the original space to a high-dimensional feature space, and was compared with the kernel principle component analysis （KPCA）. The results show that the best error rate in handwritten digit recognition by kernel factor analysis with vadmax （4.2%） was superior to KPCA （4.4%）. The KFA with varimax could more accurately image handwritten digit recognition.展开更多
How to fit a properly nonlinear classification model from conventional well logs to lithofacies is a key problem for machine learning methods.Kernel methods(e.g.,KFD,SVM,MSVM)are effective attempts to solve this issue...How to fit a properly nonlinear classification model from conventional well logs to lithofacies is a key problem for machine learning methods.Kernel methods(e.g.,KFD,SVM,MSVM)are effective attempts to solve this issue due to abilities of handling nonlinear features by kernel functions.Deep mining of log features indicating lithofacies still needs to be improved for kernel methods.Hence,this work employs deep neural networks to enhance the kernel principal component analysis(KPCA)method and proposes a deep kernel method(DKM)for lithofacies identification using well logs.DKM includes a feature extractor and a classifier.The feature extractor consists of a series of KPCA models arranged according to residual network structure.A gradient-free optimization method is introduced to automatically optimize parameters and structure in DKM,which can avoid complex tuning of parameters in models.To test the validation of the proposed DKM for lithofacies identification,an open-sourced dataset with seven con-ventional logs(GR,CAL,AC,DEN,CNL,LLD,and LLS)and lithofacies labels from the Daniudi Gas Field in China is used.There are eight lithofacies,namely clastic rocks(pebbly,coarse,medium,and fine sand-stone,siltstone,mudstone),coal,and carbonate rocks.The comparisons between DKM and three commonly used kernel methods(KFD,SVM,MSVM)show that(1)DKM(85.7%)outperforms SVM(77%),KFD(79.5%),and MSVM(82.8%)in accuracy of lithofacies identification;(2)DKM is about twice faster than the multi-kernel method(MSVM)with good accuracy.The blind well test in Well D13 indicates that compared with the other three methods DKM improves about 24%in accuracy,35%in precision,41%in recall,and 40%in F1 score,respectively.In general,DKM is an effective method for complex lithofacies identification.This work also discussed the optimal structure and classifier for DKM.Experimental re-sults show that(m_(1),m_(2),O)is the optimal model structure and linear svM is the optimal classifier.(m_(1),m_(2),O)means there are m KPCAs,and then m2 residual units.A workflow to determine an optimal classifier in DKM for lithofacies identification is proposed,too.展开更多
基金The National Defence Foundation of China (No.NEWL51435Qt220401)
文摘Kernal factor analysis （KFA） with vafimax was proposed by using Mercer kernel function which can map the data in the original space to a high-dimensional feature space, and was compared with the kernel principle component analysis （KPCA）. The results show that the best error rate in handwritten digit recognition by kernel factor analysis with vadmax （4.2%） was superior to KPCA （4.4%）. The KFA with varimax could more accurately image handwritten digit recognition.
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.42002134)China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(Grant No.2021T140735)Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum,Beijing(Grant Nos.2462020XKJS02 and 2462020YXZZ004).
文摘How to fit a properly nonlinear classification model from conventional well logs to lithofacies is a key problem for machine learning methods.Kernel methods(e.g.,KFD,SVM,MSVM)are effective attempts to solve this issue due to abilities of handling nonlinear features by kernel functions.Deep mining of log features indicating lithofacies still needs to be improved for kernel methods.Hence,this work employs deep neural networks to enhance the kernel principal component analysis(KPCA)method and proposes a deep kernel method(DKM)for lithofacies identification using well logs.DKM includes a feature extractor and a classifier.The feature extractor consists of a series of KPCA models arranged according to residual network structure.A gradient-free optimization method is introduced to automatically optimize parameters and structure in DKM,which can avoid complex tuning of parameters in models.To test the validation of the proposed DKM for lithofacies identification,an open-sourced dataset with seven con-ventional logs(GR,CAL,AC,DEN,CNL,LLD,and LLS)and lithofacies labels from the Daniudi Gas Field in China is used.There are eight lithofacies,namely clastic rocks(pebbly,coarse,medium,and fine sand-stone,siltstone,mudstone),coal,and carbonate rocks.The comparisons between DKM and three commonly used kernel methods(KFD,SVM,MSVM)show that(1)DKM(85.7%)outperforms SVM(77%),KFD(79.5%),and MSVM(82.8%)in accuracy of lithofacies identification;(2)DKM is about twice faster than the multi-kernel method(MSVM)with good accuracy.The blind well test in Well D13 indicates that compared with the other three methods DKM improves about 24%in accuracy,35%in precision,41%in recall,and 40%in F1 score,respectively.In general,DKM is an effective method for complex lithofacies identification.This work also discussed the optimal structure and classifier for DKM.Experimental re-sults show that(m_(1),m_(2),O)is the optimal model structure and linear svM is the optimal classifier.(m_(1),m_(2),O)means there are m KPCAs,and then m2 residual units.A workflow to determine an optimal classifier in DKM for lithofacies identification is proposed,too.
