Exploring the effective and efficient path of agricultural carbon emission reduction in Henan Province is of great significance to optimizing the strategic layout of China's agricultural emission reduction and car...Exploring the effective and efficient path of agricultural carbon emission reduction in Henan Province is of great significance to optimizing the strategic layout of China's agricultural emission reduction and carbon sequestration.Accordingly,the agricultural carbon emissions of each county were measured scientifically and then the spatial measurement model was utilized to clarify the spatial and temporal evolution trend and spatial effect mechanism of agricultural carbon emissions based on the county data of Henan Province from 2010 to 2020.The results showed that:(1)in 2020,the total agricultural carbon emissions were 134.7274 million tons,with the high distribution in the southeast and low distribution in the northwest;(2)the spatial dependence of agricultural carbon emissions showed a four-stage trend of fluctuating down-continuing up-plummeting-fluctuating up again,and the spatial heterogeneity was dominated by low-low agglomeration,followed by high-low agglomeration;(3)there was an inverted U curve relationship between the level of agricultural economic development and agricultural carbon emissions.The increase in the level of agricultural mechanization and urbanization rate significantly reduced agricultural carbon emissions.The opposite was true for the financial support for agriculture,the income level of rural residents and the structure of the agricultural industry;(4)in terms of spatial spillover effects,the increase in the level of agricultural development in neighbor counties first increased and then decreased agricultural carbon emissions in Henan Province.The mechanization level and urbanization rate of neighbor counties reduced agricultural carbon emissions in Henan Province,and the opposite was true for the income level of rural residents and the scale utilization of agricultural land.展开更多
A circular and sustainable economy for the private transport sector requires a holistic view of the emitted CO_(2) emissions.Looking at the energy supplied to the vehicle in terms of a circular economy leads to defoss...A circular and sustainable economy for the private transport sector requires a holistic view of the emitted CO_(2) emissions.Looking at the energy supplied to the vehicle in terms of a circular economy leads to defossilisation.The remaining energy sources or forms are renewable electric energy,green hydrogen and renewable fuels.A holistic view of the CO_(2) emissions of these energy sources and forms and the resulting powertrain technologies must take into account all cradle-to-grave emissions for both the vehicle and the energy supply.In order to compare the different forms of energy,the three most relevant forms of powertrain technology are considered and a configuration is chosen that allows for an appropriate comparison.For this purpose,data from the FVV project“Powertrain 2040”are used[1]and combined with research data on the energy supply chain for passenger cars.The three comparable powertrain configurations are a battery electric vehicle,a fuel cell electric vehicle and an internal combustion engine hybrid vehicle fueled with electric fuel.First,the three selected powertrain configurations are presented in terms of their performance,weight,technology and other characteristics.A comparative analysis is carried out for different CO_(2) emissions of the electricity mix.The electricity mix is used for both the production of the vehicle and the energy.The results are presented in the form of cradle-to-wheel emissions,which consider the total CO_(2) emissions of the vehicle over its life cycle.Finally,the results are analyzed and discussed to determine which powertrain technology fits best into which energy sector CO_(2) emissions window.展开更多
基金Supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Program of the Ministry of Education(23YJA790027)。
文摘Exploring the effective and efficient path of agricultural carbon emission reduction in Henan Province is of great significance to optimizing the strategic layout of China's agricultural emission reduction and carbon sequestration.Accordingly,the agricultural carbon emissions of each county were measured scientifically and then the spatial measurement model was utilized to clarify the spatial and temporal evolution trend and spatial effect mechanism of agricultural carbon emissions based on the county data of Henan Province from 2010 to 2020.The results showed that:(1)in 2020,the total agricultural carbon emissions were 134.7274 million tons,with the high distribution in the southeast and low distribution in the northwest;(2)the spatial dependence of agricultural carbon emissions showed a four-stage trend of fluctuating down-continuing up-plummeting-fluctuating up again,and the spatial heterogeneity was dominated by low-low agglomeration,followed by high-low agglomeration;(3)there was an inverted U curve relationship between the level of agricultural economic development and agricultural carbon emissions.The increase in the level of agricultural mechanization and urbanization rate significantly reduced agricultural carbon emissions.The opposite was true for the financial support for agriculture,the income level of rural residents and the structure of the agricultural industry;(4)in terms of spatial spillover effects,the increase in the level of agricultural development in neighbor counties first increased and then decreased agricultural carbon emissions in Henan Province.The mechanization level and urbanization rate of neighbor counties reduced agricultural carbon emissions in Henan Province,and the opposite was true for the income level of rural residents and the scale utilization of agricultural land.
文摘A circular and sustainable economy for the private transport sector requires a holistic view of the emitted CO_(2) emissions.Looking at the energy supplied to the vehicle in terms of a circular economy leads to defossilisation.The remaining energy sources or forms are renewable electric energy,green hydrogen and renewable fuels.A holistic view of the CO_(2) emissions of these energy sources and forms and the resulting powertrain technologies must take into account all cradle-to-grave emissions for both the vehicle and the energy supply.In order to compare the different forms of energy,the three most relevant forms of powertrain technology are considered and a configuration is chosen that allows for an appropriate comparison.For this purpose,data from the FVV project“Powertrain 2040”are used[1]and combined with research data on the energy supply chain for passenger cars.The three comparable powertrain configurations are a battery electric vehicle,a fuel cell electric vehicle and an internal combustion engine hybrid vehicle fueled with electric fuel.First,the three selected powertrain configurations are presented in terms of their performance,weight,technology and other characteristics.A comparative analysis is carried out for different CO_(2) emissions of the electricity mix.The electricity mix is used for both the production of the vehicle and the energy.The results are presented in the form of cradle-to-wheel emissions,which consider the total CO_(2) emissions of the vehicle over its life cycle.Finally,the results are analyzed and discussed to determine which powertrain technology fits best into which energy sector CO_(2) emissions window.
