为了在地震波激励下对大跨桥梁结构建立一套振动控制系统评价体系,比较不同控制策略的控制效果,将艾默生纪念桥(Emerson Memorial Bridge)作为斜拉桥振动控制的Benchmark模型,用以研究地震激励下斜拉桥振动控制所采取的各种控制算法和...为了在地震波激励下对大跨桥梁结构建立一套振动控制系统评价体系,比较不同控制策略的控制效果,将艾默生纪念桥(Emerson Memorial Bridge)作为斜拉桥振动控制的Benchmark模型,用以研究地震激励下斜拉桥振动控制所采取的各种控制算法和装置的有效性。系统总结十余年来各国学者在该研究中涉及到的各种传统控制算法以及智能算法,阐述了该桥被动控制、主动控制、半主动控制、混合控制的应用情况,对未来的研究趋势进行展望。以艾默生纪念桥为例,选取新型主动EMD阻尼器作为控制装置,实施基于模糊推理的智能控制。将EMD装置的速度作为模糊控制器输入,制定模糊规则,快速、有效地确定EMD装置输出电压,从而对该桥在线实时控制。数值仿真结果表明:18项控制指标接近于样本控制,尤其对基础处剪力、倾覆力矩以及桥塔处拉索的减振控制效果明显。展开更多
Itanium is the first generation product processor based on IA-64 architecture. ORC(Open Research Compil-er )provides an open source IPF(Itanium Processor Family)research compiler infrastructure. We have compiled andru...Itanium is the first generation product processor based on IA-64 architecture. ORC(Open Research Compil-er )provides an open source IPF(Itanium Processor Family)research compiler infrastructure. We have compiled andrun NAS Benchmarks on the Itanium machine. This paper briefly describes the performance of orcc, sgicc and gcc inthe following 3 ways: execution time, compilation time, and executable file size. The results show that orcc has near-ly the same performance as sgicc, which is 2 fold faster over gcc in the aspect of execution time. We also find that evenwith the best-optimized program, the utilization ratio of process resources is no more that 70%.展开更多
文摘为了在地震波激励下对大跨桥梁结构建立一套振动控制系统评价体系,比较不同控制策略的控制效果,将艾默生纪念桥(Emerson Memorial Bridge)作为斜拉桥振动控制的Benchmark模型,用以研究地震激励下斜拉桥振动控制所采取的各种控制算法和装置的有效性。系统总结十余年来各国学者在该研究中涉及到的各种传统控制算法以及智能算法,阐述了该桥被动控制、主动控制、半主动控制、混合控制的应用情况,对未来的研究趋势进行展望。以艾默生纪念桥为例,选取新型主动EMD阻尼器作为控制装置,实施基于模糊推理的智能控制。将EMD装置的速度作为模糊控制器输入,制定模糊规则,快速、有效地确定EMD装置输出电压,从而对该桥在线实时控制。数值仿真结果表明:18项控制指标接近于样本控制,尤其对基础处剪力、倾覆力矩以及桥塔处拉索的减振控制效果明显。
文摘Itanium is the first generation product processor based on IA-64 architecture. ORC(Open Research Compil-er )provides an open source IPF(Itanium Processor Family)research compiler infrastructure. We have compiled andrun NAS Benchmarks on the Itanium machine. This paper briefly describes the performance of orcc, sgicc and gcc inthe following 3 ways: execution time, compilation time, and executable file size. The results show that orcc has near-ly the same performance as sgicc, which is 2 fold faster over gcc in the aspect of execution time. We also find that evenwith the best-optimized program, the utilization ratio of process resources is no more that 70%.
