Objective To analyze the influence of segmental pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation on the correction results in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior selective thoracic fusion. Metho...Objective To analyze the influence of segmental pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation on the correction results in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior selective thoracic fusion. Methods By reviewing the medical records and roentgenograms of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent selective thoracic fusion from February 2000 to January 2007 in our hospital, the patients were divided into 2 groups according to different instrumentation fashions： Group A was hook-screw-rod （hybrid） internal fixation type, Group B was screw-rod （all pedicle screws） internal fixation type, and the screws were used in every segment on the concave side of the thoracic curve. The parameters of the scoliosis were measured and the correction results were analyzed. Results Totally, 48 patients （7 males, 41 females） were included, with an average age of 14.4 years old and a mean follow-up time of 12.3 months. Thirty and 18 patients were assigned to group A and group B, respectively. The mean preoperative coronal Cobb angles of the thoracic curve were 48.8° and 47.4°, respectively. After surgery, they were corrected to 13.7° and 6.8°, respectively. At final follow-up, they were 17.0° and 9.5°, with an average correction rate of 64.6% and 79.0%, respectively, and the correction rate of group B was significantly higher than that of group A （P=0.003）. The mean preoperative coronal Cobb angles of the lumbar curve were 32.6° and 35.2°, respectively. After surgery, they were corrected to 8.6° and 8.3°, respectively. At final follow-up, they were 10.3° and 11.1°, with an average correction rate of 66.8% and 69.9%, respectively, and the correction rate of group B was significantly higher than that of group A （P=0.003）. The correction loss of the thoracic curve and lumbar curve in the 2 groups were 3.1° and 1.8°, 2.4° and 2.4°, respectively. No significant difference was noted （both P〉0.05）. The decompensation rate at final follow-up in these 2 groups were 4% （1/25） and 7.1% （1/14） respectively, with no significant difference （P〉0.05）.展开更多
目的探讨经单侧行病变节段椎管减压、椎间植骨融合、单边椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床疗效。方法我院2010年1月~2013年12月对35例腰椎退变性疾病采用经单侧减压、椎间植骨融合、单边椎弓根螺钉固定手术治疗。根据JOA评分...目的探讨经单侧行病变节段椎管减压、椎间植骨融合、单边椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床疗效。方法我院2010年1月~2013年12月对35例腰椎退变性疾病采用经单侧减压、椎间植骨融合、单边椎弓根螺钉固定手术治疗。根据JOA评分法评估术后腰椎功能改善情况,采用视觉模拟评分（visual analog scale,VAS）评估术后疼痛缓解情况,腰椎正侧位X线片及CT扫描了解植骨融合情况。结果随访12~18个月,平均15个月。术前JOA评分（8.2±2.1）分,显著低于术后3个月（20.8±3.8）分（q=22.123,P〈0.05）和术后12个月（21.7±3.9）分（q=23.703,P〈0.05）;VAS评分术前（7.9±2.1）分,显著高于术后3个月（2.4±0.4）分（q=26.107,P〈0.05）和12个月（2.3±0.3）分（q=26.582,P〈0.05）;JOA评分和VAS评分随访期间无显著变化（P〉0.05）。1年后椎间植骨融合率100%,未发现椎弓根螺钉松动、断裂、拔钉等异常。结论经单侧减压、椎间植骨融合联合单边椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎退变性疾病疗效满意,可在合适病例中推广应用。展开更多
目的探究并分析单侧双通道内镜技术(UBE)在腰椎间盘突出(LDH)患者的治疗效果及其对日本骨科学会(JOA)评分的影响。方法选取2020年10月~2021年12月收治的69例LDH患者,按照随机数字表法将其分为观察组(n=34)和对照组(n=35)。对照组采用后...目的探究并分析单侧双通道内镜技术(UBE)在腰椎间盘突出(LDH)患者的治疗效果及其对日本骨科学会(JOA)评分的影响。方法选取2020年10月~2021年12月收治的69例LDH患者,按照随机数字表法将其分为观察组(n=34)和对照组(n=35)。对照组采用后路切开髓核摘除椎弓根内固定椎间融合治疗治疗,观察组采用UBE进行治疗。观察两组患者一般资料(年龄、性别、病变区域、手术的时间、病程、出血量等)、手术前后评分即视觉模拟评分(VAS)、JOA评分、腰痛Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分。结果两组患者术前VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后VAS评分均较术前下降(P<0.05),观察组患者术后1、24、72 h的VAS评分较对照组下降(P<0.05);两组患者术前JOA评分差异无统计学意义(9.34±0.33 vs 9.23±0.43,P>0.05),术后JOA评分均较术前升高(P<0.05),术后6月观察组患者的JOA评分高于对照组(15.54±0.52 vs 14.23±0.43,P<0.05);两组患者术前ODI评分差异无统计学意义(15.43±3.54 vs 15.74±3.34,P>0.05),术后1月、6月两组ODI评分较术前升高(P<0.05),术后6月观察组患者ODI评分高于对照组(51.43±3.73 vs 48.75±3.64,P<0.05)。两组患者术前血清HMGB1、IL-6水平差异无统计学意义(4.43±0.54 vs 4.41±0.65、44.74±4.25 vs 45.54±4.54,P>0.05),术后1月、6月两组患者较术前均有升高(P<0.05),且观察组患者术后6月均较对照组降低(5.4±0.54 vs 6.54±0.32、46.85±4.45 vs 52.63±4.41,P<0.05)。结论UBE手术较后路切开髓核摘除椎弓根内固定椎间融合术更能有效降低LDH患者的疼痛程度,改善患者腰椎稳定性,值得临床推广。展开更多
文摘Objective To analyze the influence of segmental pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation on the correction results in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior selective thoracic fusion. Methods By reviewing the medical records and roentgenograms of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent selective thoracic fusion from February 2000 to January 2007 in our hospital, the patients were divided into 2 groups according to different instrumentation fashions： Group A was hook-screw-rod （hybrid） internal fixation type, Group B was screw-rod （all pedicle screws） internal fixation type, and the screws were used in every segment on the concave side of the thoracic curve. The parameters of the scoliosis were measured and the correction results were analyzed. Results Totally, 48 patients （7 males, 41 females） were included, with an average age of 14.4 years old and a mean follow-up time of 12.3 months. Thirty and 18 patients were assigned to group A and group B, respectively. The mean preoperative coronal Cobb angles of the thoracic curve were 48.8° and 47.4°, respectively. After surgery, they were corrected to 13.7° and 6.8°, respectively. At final follow-up, they were 17.0° and 9.5°, with an average correction rate of 64.6% and 79.0%, respectively, and the correction rate of group B was significantly higher than that of group A （P=0.003）. The mean preoperative coronal Cobb angles of the lumbar curve were 32.6° and 35.2°, respectively. After surgery, they were corrected to 8.6° and 8.3°, respectively. At final follow-up, they were 10.3° and 11.1°, with an average correction rate of 66.8% and 69.9%, respectively, and the correction rate of group B was significantly higher than that of group A （P=0.003）. The correction loss of the thoracic curve and lumbar curve in the 2 groups were 3.1° and 1.8°, 2.4° and 2.4°, respectively. No significant difference was noted （both P〉0.05）. The decompensation rate at final follow-up in these 2 groups were 4% （1/25） and 7.1% （1/14） respectively, with no significant difference （P〉0.05）.
文摘目的探讨经单侧行病变节段椎管减压、椎间植骨融合、单边椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床疗效。方法我院2010年1月~2013年12月对35例腰椎退变性疾病采用经单侧减压、椎间植骨融合、单边椎弓根螺钉固定手术治疗。根据JOA评分法评估术后腰椎功能改善情况,采用视觉模拟评分（visual analog scale,VAS）评估术后疼痛缓解情况,腰椎正侧位X线片及CT扫描了解植骨融合情况。结果随访12~18个月,平均15个月。术前JOA评分（8.2±2.1）分,显著低于术后3个月（20.8±3.8）分（q=22.123,P〈0.05）和术后12个月（21.7±3.9）分（q=23.703,P〈0.05）;VAS评分术前（7.9±2.1）分,显著高于术后3个月（2.4±0.4）分（q=26.107,P〈0.05）和12个月（2.3±0.3）分（q=26.582,P〈0.05）;JOA评分和VAS评分随访期间无显著变化（P〉0.05）。1年后椎间植骨融合率100%,未发现椎弓根螺钉松动、断裂、拔钉等异常。结论经单侧减压、椎间植骨融合联合单边椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗腰椎退变性疾病疗效满意,可在合适病例中推广应用。
文摘目的探究并分析单侧双通道内镜技术(UBE)在腰椎间盘突出(LDH)患者的治疗效果及其对日本骨科学会(JOA)评分的影响。方法选取2020年10月~2021年12月收治的69例LDH患者,按照随机数字表法将其分为观察组(n=34)和对照组(n=35)。对照组采用后路切开髓核摘除椎弓根内固定椎间融合治疗治疗,观察组采用UBE进行治疗。观察两组患者一般资料(年龄、性别、病变区域、手术的时间、病程、出血量等)、手术前后评分即视觉模拟评分(VAS)、JOA评分、腰痛Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分。结果两组患者术前VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后VAS评分均较术前下降(P<0.05),观察组患者术后1、24、72 h的VAS评分较对照组下降(P<0.05);两组患者术前JOA评分差异无统计学意义(9.34±0.33 vs 9.23±0.43,P>0.05),术后JOA评分均较术前升高(P<0.05),术后6月观察组患者的JOA评分高于对照组(15.54±0.52 vs 14.23±0.43,P<0.05);两组患者术前ODI评分差异无统计学意义(15.43±3.54 vs 15.74±3.34,P>0.05),术后1月、6月两组ODI评分较术前升高(P<0.05),术后6月观察组患者ODI评分高于对照组(51.43±3.73 vs 48.75±3.64,P<0.05)。两组患者术前血清HMGB1、IL-6水平差异无统计学意义(4.43±0.54 vs 4.41±0.65、44.74±4.25 vs 45.54±4.54,P>0.05),术后1月、6月两组患者较术前均有升高(P<0.05),且观察组患者术后6月均较对照组降低(5.4±0.54 vs 6.54±0.32、46.85±4.45 vs 52.63±4.41,P<0.05)。结论UBE手术较后路切开髓核摘除椎弓根内固定椎间融合术更能有效降低LDH患者的疼痛程度,改善患者腰椎稳定性,值得临床推广。
