Qualitative indices in multi-objective decision can usually be evaluated and measured by mathematical methods or models, but the obtained results are sometimes inaccurate because of fuzziness of indices. To improve th...Qualitative indices in multi-objective decision can usually be evaluated and measured by mathematical methods or models, but the obtained results are sometimes inaccurate because of fuzziness of indices. To improve the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation results, set-value statistic principle is applied, and accordingly four evaluation methods are obtained. Meanwhile, these methods are compared briefly.展开更多
基于证据理论与直觉模糊集之间的关系,提出了一种新的证据可靠性评估方法,该方法可以在先验知识缺乏的情况下,对各证据源的可靠性进行评估。首先,将证据理论中的基本概率赋值函数(Basic Probability Assignment,BPA)转化为直觉模糊集;然...基于证据理论与直觉模糊集之间的关系,提出了一种新的证据可靠性评估方法,该方法可以在先验知识缺乏的情况下,对各证据源的可靠性进行评估。首先,将证据理论中的基本概率赋值函数(Basic Probability Assignment,BPA)转化为直觉模糊集;然后,通过直觉模糊集之间的相似度度量对各BPA之间的相似度进行计算;在此基础上,提出证据支持度的概念,通过分析证据支持度与证据可靠性之间的关系,获得证据的相对可靠性和绝对可靠性;最后,基于证据折扣运算对原始证据进行修正,采用Dempster组合规则对修正后的证据进行组合。此外,基于直觉模糊框架内的证据可靠性评估,提出了一种多传感器融合方法,通过数值实验对该方法的性能进行了对比分析,结果表明,该方法可以实现对不可靠证据的有效评估。展开更多
基金This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 79725002) the Youth Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2001).
文摘Qualitative indices in multi-objective decision can usually be evaluated and measured by mathematical methods or models, but the obtained results are sometimes inaccurate because of fuzziness of indices. To improve the accuracy and reliability of the evaluation results, set-value statistic principle is applied, and accordingly four evaluation methods are obtained. Meanwhile, these methods are compared briefly.
文摘基于证据理论与直觉模糊集之间的关系,提出了一种新的证据可靠性评估方法,该方法可以在先验知识缺乏的情况下,对各证据源的可靠性进行评估。首先,将证据理论中的基本概率赋值函数(Basic Probability Assignment,BPA)转化为直觉模糊集;然后,通过直觉模糊集之间的相似度度量对各BPA之间的相似度进行计算;在此基础上,提出证据支持度的概念,通过分析证据支持度与证据可靠性之间的关系,获得证据的相对可靠性和绝对可靠性;最后,基于证据折扣运算对原始证据进行修正,采用Dempster组合规则对修正后的证据进行组合。此外,基于直觉模糊框架内的证据可靠性评估,提出了一种多传感器融合方法,通过数值实验对该方法的性能进行了对比分析,结果表明,该方法可以实现对不可靠证据的有效评估。
