目的探讨基础疾病评分系统查尔森基础疾病权重指数(Charlson’s weighted index of comorbidities,WIC)评估脓毒症患者预后的价值。方法回顾性分析3年收治的234例脓毒症患者的临床资料,计算WIC评分及急性病理生理和慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(A...目的探讨基础疾病评分系统查尔森基础疾病权重指数(Charlson’s weighted index of comorbidities,WIC)评估脓毒症患者预后的价值。方法回顾性分析3年收治的234例脓毒症患者的临床资料,计算WIC评分及急性病理生理和慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ),根据28d预后情况分为存活组和死亡组,分析WIC评分对患者预后的评估价值。结果共有234例脓毒症患者纳入研究,死亡77例(32.9%)。WIC评分越高,患者的死亡风险越大;多因素logistic回归分析提示WIC评分是决定脓毒症患者预后的危险因素(OR=1.434,95%CI:1.097～1.875,P=0.008);WIC评分、APACHEⅡ评分以及两者联合预测死亡概率的ROC曲线下面积(95%CI)分别0.670(0.591～0.748)、0.770(0.703～0.837)和0.821(0.757～0.885)。结论 WIC评分可以较好地评估基础疾病对于危重病患者预后的影响。展开更多
Although body mass index(BMI)is widely used as a simple tool to assess obesity,it has certain limitations and inaccuracies.It is known that visceral adipose tissue is closely related to cardiometabolic risks and all-c...Although body mass index(BMI)is widely used as a simple tool to assess obesity,it has certain limitations and inaccuracies.It is known that visceral adipose tissue is closely related to cardiometabolic risks and all-cause mortality;however,precise measurement methods for visceral fat(magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography)cannot be widely used.Thus,simple but accurate alternatives are valuable.Studies have shown that waist circumference-to-height ratio(WHtR)might be a superior and more accurate variable in assessing central or visceral adiposity as well as predicting risks of diabetes and other cardiometabolic diseases.Furthermore,WHtR cutoff values can be consistent across different races,age,and genders,making it a universal metric worth promoting and applying.展开更多
文摘目的探讨基础疾病评分系统查尔森基础疾病权重指数(Charlson’s weighted index of comorbidities,WIC)评估脓毒症患者预后的价值。方法回顾性分析3年收治的234例脓毒症患者的临床资料,计算WIC评分及急性病理生理和慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ),根据28d预后情况分为存活组和死亡组,分析WIC评分对患者预后的评估价值。结果共有234例脓毒症患者纳入研究,死亡77例(32.9%)。WIC评分越高,患者的死亡风险越大;多因素logistic回归分析提示WIC评分是决定脓毒症患者预后的危险因素(OR=1.434,95%CI:1.097～1.875,P=0.008);WIC评分、APACHEⅡ评分以及两者联合预测死亡概率的ROC曲线下面积(95%CI)分别0.670(0.591～0.748)、0.770(0.703～0.837)和0.821(0.757～0.885)。结论 WIC评分可以较好地评估基础疾病对于危重病患者预后的影响。
基金supported by the“1·3·5 Project”for Disciplines of Excellence,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,China(ZYGD18017)。
文摘Although body mass index(BMI)is widely used as a simple tool to assess obesity,it has certain limitations and inaccuracies.It is known that visceral adipose tissue is closely related to cardiometabolic risks and all-cause mortality;however,precise measurement methods for visceral fat(magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography)cannot be widely used.Thus,simple but accurate alternatives are valuable.Studies have shown that waist circumference-to-height ratio(WHtR)might be a superior and more accurate variable in assessing central or visceral adiposity as well as predicting risks of diabetes and other cardiometabolic diseases.Furthermore,WHtR cutoff values can be consistent across different races,age,and genders,making it a universal metric worth promoting and applying.
