期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
口腔急诊中非外伤牙痛临床诊疗特征分析 被引量:5
1
作者 张昕 周伟伟 +1 位作者 丁谦文 薛亮 《实用口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第2期248-252,共5页
目的:分析非外伤牙痛临床诊疗特征。方法:纳入非外伤牙痛就诊患者1127例。根据疼痛发生的组织来源分为牙髓来源(51.5%)、牙周来源(28.0%)、口腔颌面部肿痛(10.0%)、不明原因(7.7%)和非急性痛(2.8%)5组。根据年龄分为青年(20~39岁,337例... 目的:分析非外伤牙痛临床诊疗特征。方法:纳入非外伤牙痛就诊患者1127例。根据疼痛发生的组织来源分为牙髓来源(51.5%)、牙周来源(28.0%)、口腔颌面部肿痛(10.0%)、不明原因(7.7%)和非急性痛(2.8%)5组。根据年龄分为青年(20~39岁,337例)、中年(40~59岁,353例)、老年(60~89岁,377例)3组。分别比较5组诊断组间疼痛特征及处置措施差异,3组不同年龄组间急诊处置措施及全身疾病情况差异。数值变量分析应用独立样本t检验,分类变量分析应用χ2检验。结果:5组诊断组间年龄差异有统计学意义P=0.000,牙髓源性疼痛发病率最高(59.2%),牙周源性最高(34.7%),1095例确定为急诊患者中,629例(57.4%)采取相应急诊手术治疗,青年组手术治疗比例(63.9%)高于中年组(55.9%)和老年组(52.2%)(P=0.006),老年组伴有全身疾病者(35.3%)多于中年组(33.1%)和青年组(31.6%)(P=0.000)。结论:建议在口腔急诊分级标准中细化以牙痛为就诊需求的口腔急症,关注患者全身疾病情况,保障口腔急诊诊疗安全。 展开更多
关键词 口腔急诊 非外伤牙痛 临床诊疗特征 急诊分级标准
在线阅读 下载PDF
福建省人感染H7N9禽流感诊疗特征分析
2
作者 陈光敏 谢剑锋 +3 位作者 林兰 欧剑鸣 郑月燕 郑奎城 《中国人兽共患病学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2019年第11期1051-1056,共6页
目的分析福建省人感染H7N9禽流感诊疗特征,以期为疾病防控和临床救治提供参考。方法采用SPSS 23.0、SAS9.2软件对福建省人感染H7N9禽流感诊疗特征进行描述性分析。结果福建省共报告108例病例,死亡28人,病死率25.93%。病例从发病到就诊... 目的分析福建省人感染H7N9禽流感诊疗特征,以期为疾病防控和临床救治提供参考。方法采用SPSS 23.0、SAS9.2软件对福建省人感染H7N9禽流感诊疗特征进行描述性分析。结果福建省共报告108例病例,死亡28人,病死率25.93%。病例从发病到就诊、住院、确诊和抗病毒治疗中位数分别为3 d、5 d、7 d和6 d,死亡病例组发病至死亡中位数16 d,从发病至实验室确诊比早期提前1 d。一半以上病例没有在5 d内使用抗病毒治疗药物,死亡风险可能没有得到有效降低。46.3%的病例伴有基础疾病,随年龄增长患基础疾病和重症率增加(Z=4.75,P<0.01;Z=5.07,P<0.01)。男女病死率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ^2=28.37,P<0.01),各年龄组病死率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ^2=2.23,P=0.53)。患心血管疾病(OR=2.60,95%CI:1.06~6.39)、出现肺炎(OR=1.27,95%CI:1.13~1.42)、重症(OR=1.24,95%CI:1.13~1.42)、需进ICU(OR=3.80,95%CI:1.20~11.99)、合并细菌感染需要使用抗生素(OR=1.19,95%CI:1.08~1.32)和需使用激素(OR=7.47,95%CI:1.64~33.95)等因素增加病死风险。结论福建省人感染H7N9禽流感病例诊断能力较早期有所提高,抗病毒治疗仍不及时。当患者伴有心血管疾病和需要使用激素等危险因素时,应积极加强救治,降低病死率。 展开更多
关键词 人感染H7N9禽流感 诊疗特征 死亡
在线阅读 下载PDF
Domestic research on extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors:A ten-year review
3
作者 WANG Shengjin SUN Feng WANG Xinghong 《中南大学学报(医学版)》 北大核心 2025年第2期237-250,共14页
Objective:There is currently no consensus on whether extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors(EGISTs)and gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)are the same type of tumor,and whether the diagnosis and treatment of EGISTs ... Objective:There is currently no consensus on whether extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors(EGISTs)and gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs)are the same type of tumor,and whether the diagnosis and treatment of EGISTs can directly replicate the current diagnostic and treatment standards for GISTs.This study aims to further elucidate the clinical and pathological characteristics,diagnosis,treatment,and prognosis of EGISTs by analyzing the research results of domestic scholars in the field of EGISTs in the past decade.Methods:A review was conducted on original Chinese and English research articles published from 2013 to 2022 focusing on EGISTs.A descriptive approach was used to extract key information from the literature,including patient demographics,tumor location,tumor diameter,mitotic figures,risk stratification,immunohistochemical markers,cell type,and prognostic factors.The data were subjected to statistical analysis.Results:A total of 12 articles containing 780 EGIST patients were included.The male-to female incidence of EGISTs was 0.92꞉1.The most common sites of EGISTs were mesentery(30.96%),peritoneum or retroperitoneum(28.53%),omentum(20.32%),and pelvic cavity(12.52%).52.77%of EGISTs had tumor diameters greater than 10 cm,and the proportions of EGISTs with nuclear fission patterns greater than 5/50 high power field(HPF)and greater than 10/50 HPF were 51.24%and 26.11%,respectively.The proportion of high-risk EGISTs was 79.05%.The positive rates of immune markers CD117,CD34,and DOG-1 in EGISTs were 82.3%,69.0%,and 79.5%,respectively.The proportion of Ki-67>5%was 49.2%,and the proportion of Ki-67>10%was 24.8%.The proportions of EGISTs in spindle cells,epithelial cells,and mixed cells were 74.4%,14.8%,and 13.1%,respectively.The diameter of the tumor,resection method,risk level,Ki-67 index,mitotic counts,presence of rupture/bleeding/necrosis/peripheral tissue invasion/recurrence and metastasis,as well as the use of imatinib treatment after surgery were important factors affecting the prognosis of EGISTs.Conclusion:Current medical research is relatively well cognizant of GISTs with primary sites in the gastrointestinal tract.Compared with GISTs,EGISTs have large tumor diameters,high mitotic counts,a high percentage of high-risk grades,relatively unique molecular expression,and high aggressiveness.EGISTs differ from GISTs in clinicopathological characteristics.Whether EGISTs and GISTs share a common origin remains unclear.If they are distinct tumor entities,separate diagnostic and treatment guidelines for EGISTs should be established.If EGISTs are ultimately confirmed to be a special subtype of GISTs,then directly applying existing GIST-based standards to EGISTs may be inappropriate.A more scientific approach would involve subclassifying EGISTs based on anatomical location and then tailoring treatment strategies accordingly with reference to GIST guidelines. 展开更多
关键词 extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors gastrointestinal stromal tumors pathological features DIAGNOSIS treatment PROGNOSIS
在线阅读 下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部