为了避免器件温升对参数测量造成影响,"脉冲测试法"被广泛应用于功率IGBT模块的静态和动态参数测试中。该类设备内部单脉冲高压源脉冲宽度为50μs时脉冲的高压幅度可达7 k V以上,如何对该单脉冲高压源进行校准是一个技术难题...为了避免器件温升对参数测量造成影响,"脉冲测试法"被广泛应用于功率IGBT模块的静态和动态参数测试中。该类设备内部单脉冲高压源脉冲宽度为50μs时脉冲的高压幅度可达7 k V以上,如何对该单脉冲高压源进行校准是一个技术难题。研制了脉冲高电压分压器,并使用数据采集单元搭建了脉冲高压参数校准装置,解决了功率IGBT模块测试设备的脉冲高压参数校准难题。通过测量不确定分析和实验验证,综合考虑各测量不确定度分量的影响,在包含因子k为2时,脉冲高压参数校准扩展测量不确定度为1.4%。展开更多
Vestibulo-ocular reflex(VOR) is an important biological reflex that controls eye movement to ensure clear vision while the head is in motion.Nowadays,VOR measurement is commonly done with a video head impulse test bas...Vestibulo-ocular reflex(VOR) is an important biological reflex that controls eye movement to ensure clear vision while the head is in motion.Nowadays,VOR measurement is commonly done with a video head impulse test based on a velocity gain algorithm or a position gain algorithm,in which velocity gain is a VOR calculation on head and eye velocity,whereas position gain is calculated from head and eye position.The aim of this work is first to compare the two algorithms' performance and to detect covert catch-up saccade,then to propose a stand-alone recommendation application for the patient's diagnosis.In the first experiment,for ipsilesional and contralesional sides,the calculated position gain(0.94±0.17) is higher than velocity gain(0.84±0.19).Moreover,gain asymmetry of both lesion and intact sides using velocity gain is mostly higher than that from using position gain(four out of five subjects).Consequently,for subjects who have unilateral vestibular neuritis diagnosed from clinical symptoms and a vestibular function test,vestibular weakness is depicted by velocity gain much better than by position gain.Covert catch-up saccade and position gain then are used as inputs for recommendation applications.展开更多
文摘为了避免器件温升对参数测量造成影响,"脉冲测试法"被广泛应用于功率IGBT模块的静态和动态参数测试中。该类设备内部单脉冲高压源脉冲宽度为50μs时脉冲的高压幅度可达7 k V以上,如何对该单脉冲高压源进行校准是一个技术难题。研制了脉冲高电压分压器,并使用数据采集单元搭建了脉冲高压参数校准装置,解决了功率IGBT模块测试设备的脉冲高压参数校准难题。通过测量不确定分析和实验验证,综合考虑各测量不确定度分量的影响,在包含因子k为2时,脉冲高压参数校准扩展测量不确定度为1.4%。
基金supported by the MSIP (Ministry of Science,ICT and Future Planning),Korea,under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center)support program (IITP-2016-H8501-16-1019) supervised by the IITP (Institute for Information & Communications Technology Promotion) and Inha University Research Grantsupported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (2010-0020163)
文摘Vestibulo-ocular reflex(VOR) is an important biological reflex that controls eye movement to ensure clear vision while the head is in motion.Nowadays,VOR measurement is commonly done with a video head impulse test based on a velocity gain algorithm or a position gain algorithm,in which velocity gain is a VOR calculation on head and eye velocity,whereas position gain is calculated from head and eye position.The aim of this work is first to compare the two algorithms' performance and to detect covert catch-up saccade,then to propose a stand-alone recommendation application for the patient's diagnosis.In the first experiment,for ipsilesional and contralesional sides,the calculated position gain(0.94±0.17) is higher than velocity gain(0.84±0.19).Moreover,gain asymmetry of both lesion and intact sides using velocity gain is mostly higher than that from using position gain(four out of five subjects).Consequently,for subjects who have unilateral vestibular neuritis diagnosed from clinical symptoms and a vestibular function test,vestibular weakness is depicted by velocity gain much better than by position gain.Covert catch-up saccade and position gain then are used as inputs for recommendation applications.
