期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
蒙古栎数量化综合选优方法及标准的研究 被引量:6
1
作者 孙治国 徐庆新 +5 位作者 尹忠山 张文才 邢雷 王继志 陈晓波 田俊德 《吉林林业科技》 2002年第2期5-8,共4页
利用吉林省中东部蒙古栎天然实生林优树 8个主要性状的实测材料 ,根据性状权重制定了综合评分标准及优树入选的最低分数限 ,经对原优树复选检验 ,选优效果良好 。
关键词 蒙古栎 性状权重 评分标准 数量化 综合选优法 栎树
在线阅读 下载PDF
A new approach for selecting best development face ventilation mode based on G1-coefficient of variation method 被引量:14
2
作者 ZHOU Zhi-yong Mehmet KIZIL +1 位作者 CHEN Zhong-wei CHEN Jian-hong 《Journal of Central South University》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2018年第10期2462-2471,共10页
The current popular methods for decision making and project optimisation in mine ventilation contain a number of deficiencies as they are solely based on either subjective knowledge or objective information.This paper... The current popular methods for decision making and project optimisation in mine ventilation contain a number of deficiencies as they are solely based on either subjective knowledge or objective information.This paper presents a new approach to rank the alternatives by G1-coefficient of variation method.The focus of this approach is the use of the combination weighing,which is able to compensate for the deficiencies in the method of evaluation index single weighing.In the case study,an appropriate evaluation index system was established to determine the evaluation value of each ventilation mode.Then the proposed approach was used to select the best development face ventilation mode.The result shows that the proposed approach is able to rank the alternative development face ventilation mode reasonably,the combination weighing method had the advantages of both subjective and objective weighing methods in that it took into consideration of both the experience and wisdom of experts,and the new changes in objective conditions.This approach provides a more reasonable and reliable procedure to analyse and evaluate different ventilation modes. 展开更多
关键词 development face ventilation G1 method coefficient of variation method comprehensive evaluation OPTIMIZATION
在线阅读 下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部