期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
活性金属法对非氧化物陶瓷封接适用性及其作用机理分析 被引量:1
1
作者 姚忠樱 崔鸽 +4 位作者 任瑞康 任佳乐 常逸文 张洪波 旷峰华 《硅酸盐通报》 北大核心 2025年第2期690-699,共10页
采用活性金属法在真空焊接炉中分别封接同组分的非氧化物陶瓷-非氧化物陶瓷(Si_(3)N_(4)-Si_(3)N_(4)、AlN-AlN、SiC-SiC)及不同组分的非氧化物陶瓷-金属材料(Si_(3)N_(4)-4J29、Si_(3)N_(4)-304不锈钢、Si_(3)N_(4)-无氧铜、SiC-4J29、... 采用活性金属法在真空焊接炉中分别封接同组分的非氧化物陶瓷-非氧化物陶瓷(Si_(3)N_(4)-Si_(3)N_(4)、AlN-AlN、SiC-SiC)及不同组分的非氧化物陶瓷-金属材料(Si_(3)N_(4)-4J29、Si_(3)N_(4)-304不锈钢、Si_(3)N_(4)-无氧铜、SiC-4J29、SiC-304不锈钢、SiC-无氧铜、AlN-4J29、AlN-304不锈钢、AlN-无氧铜),测试样品的封接强度并采用SEM和EDS对封接界面的形貌和元素成分进行测试。结果表明:活性金属法可适用于Si_(3)N_(4)-Si_(3)N_(4)、AlN-AlN、SiC-SiC、Si_(3)N_(4)-4J29、Si_(3)N_(4)-304不锈钢、Si_(3)N_(4)-无氧铜、AlN-304不锈钢、SiC-304不锈钢及SiC-无氧铜的封接,其中非氧化物陶瓷-非氧化物陶瓷封接样品中SiC-SiC的封接强度最大,达到129.4 MPa;非氧化物陶瓷-金属材料封接样品中Si_(3)N_(4)-304不锈钢(101.9 MPa)、SiC-304不锈钢(135.7 MPa)、AlN-304不锈钢(79.1 MPa)的封接强度较大;活性金属法的核心机理在于焊料中的Ti在封接温度下会发生迁移,一部分从焊料中心区域向陶瓷界面扩散,并与N、C等元素形成TiN、TiC等化合物,从而形成较为致密的界面层,还有少量从焊料中心向金属扩散,与金属发生固熔反应,形成金属间化合物,进而形成实现异质材料之间的高强度封接。 展开更多
关键词 非氧化物陶瓷 活性金属法 封接强度 作用机理
在线阅读 下载PDF
Comparison of heavy metal removal efficiencies in four activated sludge processes 被引量:3
2
作者 杨军 高定 +3 位作者 陈同斌 雷梅 郑国砥 周小勇 《Journal of Central South University》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2015年第10期3788-3794,共7页
The removal efficiencies of heavy metals(As, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn) were investigated in the 17 operating municipal wastewater treatment plants(WWTPs) and compared with those in four main activated sludge processes. S... The removal efficiencies of heavy metals(As, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn) were investigated in the 17 operating municipal wastewater treatment plants(WWTPs) and compared with those in four main activated sludge processes. Significant differences of heavy metal removal efficiencies were observed among four activated sludge processes. The removal efficiency for As(75.5%) in the oxidation ditch(OD) process is significantly higher than that in the conventional activated sludge(CAS) process(38.6%) or sequencing batch reactor(SBR) process(51.4%). The mean removal efficiencies for Cu and Ni in the OD process are 90.5% and 46.7%, respectively, while low mean removal efficiencies are observed for Cu(69.9%) and Ni(16.5%), respectively, in the SBR process. The removal efficiencies for Cu and Ni in the OD process are significantly higher than those in the anaerobic-anoxic-oxic(A2-O) process. These results highlight the differences of removal efficiencies for heavy metals in different processes and should be considered when selecting a wastewater treatment process. 展开更多
关键词 WASTEWATER heavy metal removal efficiency treatment process activated sludge processes
在线阅读 下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部