统编教材中出现许多以下类似的句子, 1)Holding the note in his hand,he stood there dumb- founded. 2)Bob lay sick. 3)The sun rose red. 课文注释中解释为系表结构,即stand,lie,rise为系动词,这种解释不能完全令学生满意, 1.因为...统编教材中出现许多以下类似的句子, 1)Holding the note in his hand,he stood there dumb- founded. 2)Bob lay sick. 3)The sun rose red. 课文注释中解释为系表结构,即stand,lie,rise为系动词,这种解释不能完全令学生满意, 1.因为系表结构中,系动词不能单独做谓语,必须和表语一起构成复合谓语,如果略去表语,系动词的意义就要改变。例:He went red.如略去red,went意义就改变了。展开更多
有这么两个句子:(1)He stood there dumbfounded.(2)The teachercame in followed by his students,两句中的“…dumbfounded”和“…followed by his students.”是双重谓语部分还是方式伴随状语呢?我们认为这个问题值得探讨。现将此...有这么两个句子:(1)He stood there dumbfounded.(2)The teachercame in followed by his students,两句中的“…dumbfounded”和“…followed by his students.”是双重谓语部分还是方式伴随状语呢?我们认为这个问题值得探讨。现将此问题分两个方面谈谈我们的看法。展开更多
高一英语课本上有这样两个句子:1)Holding the note in his hand, he stood there dumbfounded. (p. 174)手里拿着票子,他站在那儿目瞪口呆。2)However, his knowledge of French remained very weak,…(p. 250)然而,他的法语仍然很差……
文摘统编教材中出现许多以下类似的句子, 1)Holding the note in his hand,he stood there dumb- founded. 2)Bob lay sick. 3)The sun rose red. 课文注释中解释为系表结构,即stand,lie,rise为系动词,这种解释不能完全令学生满意, 1.因为系表结构中,系动词不能单独做谓语,必须和表语一起构成复合谓语,如果略去表语,系动词的意义就要改变。例:He went red.如略去red,went意义就改变了。
文摘有这么两个句子:(1)He stood there dumbfounded.(2)The teachercame in followed by his students,两句中的“…dumbfounded”和“…followed by his students.”是双重谓语部分还是方式伴随状语呢?我们认为这个问题值得探讨。现将此问题分两个方面谈谈我们的看法。
文摘高一英语课本上有这样两个句子:1)Holding the note in his hand, he stood there dumbfounded. (p. 174)手里拿着票子,他站在那儿目瞪口呆。2)However, his knowledge of French remained very weak,…(p. 250)然而,他的法语仍然很差……
