Objective To prospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery stenosis of prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered spiral acquisition mode (high pitch mode) dual-source computed tomography corona...Objective To prospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery stenosis of prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered spiral acquisition mode (high pitch mode) dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with relatively higher heart rates (HR) compared with catheter coronary angiography (CCA). Methods Forty-seven consecutive patients with relatively higher HR (>65 and <100 bpm) (20 male, 27 female; age 55±10 years) who both underwent dual-source CTCA and CCA were prospectively included in this study. All patients were performed CTCA using high pitch mode setting at 20%-30% of the R-R interval for the image acquisition. All coronary segments were evaluated by two blinded and independent observers with regard to image quality on a three-point scale (1: excellent to 3: non-diagnostic) and for the presence of significant coronary stenoses (defined as diameter narrowing exceeding 50%). Considered CCA as the standard of reference, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Radiation dose values were calculated using the dose-length product. Results Image quality was rated as being score 1 in 92.4% of segments, score 2 in 6.1% of segmentsand score 3 in 1.5% of segments. The average image quality score per segment was 1.064±0.306. The HR variability of patients with image score 1, 2 and 3 were 2.29±1.06 bpm, 5.17±1.37 bpm, 8.88±1.53 bpm, respectively. The average HR variability of patients with different image scores were significantly different (F=170.402, P=0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 92.6%, 97.0%, 87.6%, 98.3%, respectively, per segment and 90.0%, 95.2%, 85.3%, 96.9%, respectively, per vessel and 100%, 63.6%, 90.0%, 100%, respectively, per patient. The effective radiation dose was on average 0.86±0.16 mSv. Conclusion In patients with HR more than 65 bpm and below 100 bpm without cardiac arrhythmia, the prospectively electrocardiogram-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode with image acquired timing set at 20%-30% of the R-R interval provides a high diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of coronary stenoses combined with a 1.5% of non-diagnostic coronary segments and a radiation dose below 1 mSv.展开更多
Objective To investigate the performance of dual-source computed tomography （DSCT） using high-pitch spiral fliPS） mode for coronary stents patency. Methods We conducted a prospective study on 120 patients with 260 ...Objective To investigate the performance of dual-source computed tomography （DSCT） using high-pitch spiral fliPS） mode for coronary stents patency. Methods We conducted a prospective study on 120 patients with 260 previous stents implanted due to recurred suspicious symptoms of angina scheduled for invasive coronary angiography （ICA）, while DSCT were conducted using HPS mode. Results There was no significant impact of age, body mass index or heat rate （HR） on image quality （P 〉 0.05）, while HR variability had a slight impact on that （P 〈 0.05）. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value （PPV）, negative predictive value （NPV） of DSCT in detection of in-stent restenosis （ISR） based per-patient were 92.3%, 96.7%, 88.9%, and 97.8%, respectively. And those based per-stent were 87%, 96.8%, 83.3%, and 97.7% with un-assessment stents, 97.4%, 99.5%, 97.4%, and 99.5% without un-assessment stents. There was significant differ- ence on sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV between diameter 〉 3.0 mm group （93.3%, 97.9%, 87.5%, and 98.9%） and diameter 〈 3.0 mm group （80%, 93.3%, 80.0%, and 93.3%） （P 〈 0.05）, and that between stent number 〉 3 group （82.3%, 77.8%, 66.7%, and 60%） with 〈 3 group （97.3%, 80%, 96.5%, and 75%）. The effective dose of DSCT （1.4 ± 0.5 mSv） is significantly less than that by invasive coronary angiography [4.0 ± 0.8 mSv （P 〈 0.01）]. Conclusion DSCT using HPS mode provides good diagnostic performance on stent patency with lower effective dose in patients with HR 〈 65 beats/rain.展开更多
Objective To evaluate the image quality （IQ） and radiation dose of 128-slice dual-source computed tomography （DSCT） coronary angiography using prospectively electrocardiogram （ECG）-triggered sequen- tial scan mo...Objective To evaluate the image quality （IQ） and radiation dose of 128-slice dual-source computed tomography （DSCT） coronary angiography using prospectively electrocardiogram （ECG）-triggered sequen- tial scan mode compared with ECG-gated spiral scan mode in a population with atrial fibrillation. Methods Thirty-two patients with suspected coronary artery disease and permanent atrial fibrilla- tion referred for a second-generation 128-slice DSCT coronary angiography were included in the prospec- tive study. Of them, 17 patients （sequential group） were randomly selected to use a prospectively ECG.~triggered sequential scan, while the other 15 patients （spiral group） used a retrospectively ECG-gated spiral scan. The IQ was assessed by two readers independently, using a four-point grading scale from excel- lent （grade 1） to non-assessable （grade 4）, based on the American Heart Association 15-segment model. IQ of each segment and effective dose of each natient were comDared between the two groups. Results The mean heart rate （HR） of the sequential group was 96±27 beats per minute （bpm） with a variation range of 73±25 bpm, while the mean HR of the spiral group was 86±22 bpm with a variationrange of 65±24 bpm. Both of the mean FIR （t= 1.91, P=0.243） and HR variation range （t=0.950, P=0.350） had no significant difference between the two groups. In per-segment analysis, IQ of the sequential group vs. spiral group was rated as excellent （grade 1） in 190/244 （78%） vs. 177/217 （82%） by readerl and 197/245 （80%） vs. 174/214 （81%） by reader2, as non-assessable （grade 4） in 4/244 （2%） vs. 2/217 （1%） by readerl and 6/245 （2%） vs. 4/214 （2%） by reader2. Overall averaged IQ per-patient in the sequential and spiral group showed equally good （1.27＋0.19 vs. 1.25＋0.22, Z=-0.834, P=0.404）. The effective radiation dose of the sequential group reduced significantly compared with the spiral group （4.88±1.77 mSv vs. 10.20±3.64 mSv; t=-5.372, P=0.000）. Conclusion Compared with retrospectively ECG-gated spiral scan, prospectively ECG-triggered sequential DSCT coronary angiography provides similarly diagnostically valuable images in patients with atrial fibrillation and significantly reduces radiation dose.展开更多
基金Supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Inner Mongolia, China (20110504)
文摘Objective To prospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery stenosis of prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered spiral acquisition mode (high pitch mode) dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with relatively higher heart rates (HR) compared with catheter coronary angiography (CCA). Methods Forty-seven consecutive patients with relatively higher HR (>65 and <100 bpm) (20 male, 27 female; age 55±10 years) who both underwent dual-source CTCA and CCA were prospectively included in this study. All patients were performed CTCA using high pitch mode setting at 20%-30% of the R-R interval for the image acquisition. All coronary segments were evaluated by two blinded and independent observers with regard to image quality on a three-point scale (1: excellent to 3: non-diagnostic) and for the presence of significant coronary stenoses (defined as diameter narrowing exceeding 50%). Considered CCA as the standard of reference, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Radiation dose values were calculated using the dose-length product. Results Image quality was rated as being score 1 in 92.4% of segments, score 2 in 6.1% of segmentsand score 3 in 1.5% of segments. The average image quality score per segment was 1.064±0.306. The HR variability of patients with image score 1, 2 and 3 were 2.29±1.06 bpm, 5.17±1.37 bpm, 8.88±1.53 bpm, respectively. The average HR variability of patients with different image scores were significantly different (F=170.402, P=0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 92.6%, 97.0%, 87.6%, 98.3%, respectively, per segment and 90.0%, 95.2%, 85.3%, 96.9%, respectively, per vessel and 100%, 63.6%, 90.0%, 100%, respectively, per patient. The effective radiation dose was on average 0.86±0.16 mSv. Conclusion In patients with HR more than 65 bpm and below 100 bpm without cardiac arrhythmia, the prospectively electrocardiogram-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode with image acquired timing set at 20%-30% of the R-R interval provides a high diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of coronary stenoses combined with a 1.5% of non-diagnostic coronary segments and a radiation dose below 1 mSv.
文摘Objective To investigate the performance of dual-source computed tomography （DSCT） using high-pitch spiral fliPS） mode for coronary stents patency. Methods We conducted a prospective study on 120 patients with 260 previous stents implanted due to recurred suspicious symptoms of angina scheduled for invasive coronary angiography （ICA）, while DSCT were conducted using HPS mode. Results There was no significant impact of age, body mass index or heat rate （HR） on image quality （P 〉 0.05）, while HR variability had a slight impact on that （P 〈 0.05）. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value （PPV）, negative predictive value （NPV） of DSCT in detection of in-stent restenosis （ISR） based per-patient were 92.3%, 96.7%, 88.9%, and 97.8%, respectively. And those based per-stent were 87%, 96.8%, 83.3%, and 97.7% with un-assessment stents, 97.4%, 99.5%, 97.4%, and 99.5% without un-assessment stents. There was significant differ- ence on sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV between diameter 〉 3.0 mm group （93.3%, 97.9%, 87.5%, and 98.9%） and diameter 〈 3.0 mm group （80%, 93.3%, 80.0%, and 93.3%） （P 〈 0.05）, and that between stent number 〉 3 group （82.3%, 77.8%, 66.7%, and 60%） with 〈 3 group （97.3%, 80%, 96.5%, and 75%）. The effective dose of DSCT （1.4 ± 0.5 mSv） is significantly less than that by invasive coronary angiography [4.0 ± 0.8 mSv （P 〈 0.01）]. Conclusion DSCT using HPS mode provides good diagnostic performance on stent patency with lower effective dose in patients with HR 〈 65 beats/rain.
文摘Objective To evaluate the image quality （IQ） and radiation dose of 128-slice dual-source computed tomography （DSCT） coronary angiography using prospectively electrocardiogram （ECG）-triggered sequen- tial scan mode compared with ECG-gated spiral scan mode in a population with atrial fibrillation. Methods Thirty-two patients with suspected coronary artery disease and permanent atrial fibrilla- tion referred for a second-generation 128-slice DSCT coronary angiography were included in the prospec- tive study. Of them, 17 patients （sequential group） were randomly selected to use a prospectively ECG.~triggered sequential scan, while the other 15 patients （spiral group） used a retrospectively ECG-gated spiral scan. The IQ was assessed by two readers independently, using a four-point grading scale from excel- lent （grade 1） to non-assessable （grade 4）, based on the American Heart Association 15-segment model. IQ of each segment and effective dose of each natient were comDared between the two groups. Results The mean heart rate （HR） of the sequential group was 96±27 beats per minute （bpm） with a variation range of 73±25 bpm, while the mean HR of the spiral group was 86±22 bpm with a variationrange of 65±24 bpm. Both of the mean FIR （t= 1.91, P=0.243） and HR variation range （t=0.950, P=0.350） had no significant difference between the two groups. In per-segment analysis, IQ of the sequential group vs. spiral group was rated as excellent （grade 1） in 190/244 （78%） vs. 177/217 （82%） by readerl and 197/245 （80%） vs. 174/214 （81%） by reader2, as non-assessable （grade 4） in 4/244 （2%） vs. 2/217 （1%） by readerl and 6/245 （2%） vs. 4/214 （2%） by reader2. Overall averaged IQ per-patient in the sequential and spiral group showed equally good （1.27＋0.19 vs. 1.25＋0.22, Z=-0.834, P=0.404）. The effective radiation dose of the sequential group reduced significantly compared with the spiral group （4.88±1.77 mSv vs. 10.20±3.64 mSv; t=-5.372, P=0.000）. Conclusion Compared with retrospectively ECG-gated spiral scan, prospectively ECG-triggered sequential DSCT coronary angiography provides similarly diagnostically valuable images in patients with atrial fibrillation and significantly reduces radiation dose.
