Failure mode and effect analysis(FMEA)is a preven-tative risk evaluation method used to evaluate and eliminate fail-ure modes within a system.However,the traditional FMEA method exhibits many deficiencies that pose ch...Failure mode and effect analysis(FMEA)is a preven-tative risk evaluation method used to evaluate and eliminate fail-ure modes within a system.However,the traditional FMEA method exhibits many deficiencies that pose challenges in prac-tical applications.To improve the conventional FMEA,many modified FMEA models have been suggested.However,the majority of them inadequately address consensus issues and focus on achieving a complete ranking of failure modes.In this research,we propose a new FMEA approach that integrates a two-stage consensus reaching model and a density peak clus-tering algorithm for the assessment and clustering of failure modes.Firstly,we employ the interval 2-tuple linguistic vari-ables(I2TLVs)to express the uncertain risk evaluations provided by FMEA experts.Then,a two-stage consensus reaching model is adopted to enable FMEA experts to reach a consensus.Next,failure modes are categorized into several risk clusters using a density peak clustering algorithm.Finally,the proposed FMEA is illustrated by a case study of load-bearing guidance devices of subway systems.The results show that the proposed FMEA model can more easily to describe the uncertain risk information of failure modes by using the I2TLVs;the introduction of an endogenous feedback mechanism and an exogenous feedback mechanism can accelerate the process of consensus reaching;and the density peak clustering of failure modes successfully improves the practical applicability of FMEA.展开更多
A new method of system failure analysis was proposed. First, considering the relationships between the failure subsystems,the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory(DEMATEL) method was used to calculate the d...A new method of system failure analysis was proposed. First, considering the relationships between the failure subsystems,the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory(DEMATEL) method was used to calculate the degree of correlation between the failure subsystems, analyze the combined effect of related failures, and obtain the degree of correlation by using the directed graph and matrix operations. Then, the interpretative structural modeling(ISM) method was combined to intuitively show the logical relationship of many failure subsystems and their influences on each other by using multilevel hierarchical structure model and obtaining the critical subsystems. Finally, failure mode effects and criticality analysis(FMECA) was used to perform a qualitative hazard analysis of critical subsystems, determine the critical failure mode, and clarify the direction of reliability improvement.Through an example, the result demonstrates that the proposed method can be efficiently applied to system failure analysis problems.展开更多
针对传统故障模式和影响分析(failure mode and effect analysis,FMEA)方法存在评价使用精确数量化造成专家风险评估信息的丢失、忽略风险指标之间的相对重要性以及由于专家有限理性导致的评价固有的随机性等问题,利用区间值直觉模糊集...针对传统故障模式和影响分析(failure mode and effect analysis,FMEA)方法存在评价使用精确数量化造成专家风险评估信息的丢失、忽略风险指标之间的相对重要性以及由于专家有限理性导致的评价固有的随机性等问题,利用区间值直觉模糊集和云模型构建了一种改进的FMEA风险评估方法。首先,引入区间值直觉模糊集(IVIFS)来描述专家评价信息的复杂性和不确定性,通过运用区间值直觉模糊熵,计算专家权重和风险因子的权重;其次,采用云模型的方法,通过比较各支持云模型和反对云模型与正、负理想云模型的正、负相似度,获得故障模式评价值的综合相似度,通过对综合相似度大小排序得到各故障模式风险排序;最后,以自动扶梯的梯级、踏板和胶带风险评估为例进行分析,验证该评估方法的实用性和可行性。展开更多
基金supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(22120240094)Humanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education China(22YJA630082).
文摘Failure mode and effect analysis(FMEA)is a preven-tative risk evaluation method used to evaluate and eliminate fail-ure modes within a system.However,the traditional FMEA method exhibits many deficiencies that pose challenges in prac-tical applications.To improve the conventional FMEA,many modified FMEA models have been suggested.However,the majority of them inadequately address consensus issues and focus on achieving a complete ranking of failure modes.In this research,we propose a new FMEA approach that integrates a two-stage consensus reaching model and a density peak clus-tering algorithm for the assessment and clustering of failure modes.Firstly,we employ the interval 2-tuple linguistic vari-ables(I2TLVs)to express the uncertain risk evaluations provided by FMEA experts.Then,a two-stage consensus reaching model is adopted to enable FMEA experts to reach a consensus.Next,failure modes are categorized into several risk clusters using a density peak clustering algorithm.Finally,the proposed FMEA is illustrated by a case study of load-bearing guidance devices of subway systems.The results show that the proposed FMEA model can more easily to describe the uncertain risk information of failure modes by using the I2TLVs;the introduction of an endogenous feedback mechanism and an exogenous feedback mechanism can accelerate the process of consensus reaching;and the density peak clustering of failure modes successfully improves the practical applicability of FMEA.
基金Project(51275205)supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
文摘A new method of system failure analysis was proposed. First, considering the relationships between the failure subsystems,the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory(DEMATEL) method was used to calculate the degree of correlation between the failure subsystems, analyze the combined effect of related failures, and obtain the degree of correlation by using the directed graph and matrix operations. Then, the interpretative structural modeling(ISM) method was combined to intuitively show the logical relationship of many failure subsystems and their influences on each other by using multilevel hierarchical structure model and obtaining the critical subsystems. Finally, failure mode effects and criticality analysis(FMECA) was used to perform a qualitative hazard analysis of critical subsystems, determine the critical failure mode, and clarify the direction of reliability improvement.Through an example, the result demonstrates that the proposed method can be efficiently applied to system failure analysis problems.
文摘针对传统故障模式和影响分析(failure mode and effect analysis,FMEA)方法存在评价使用精确数量化造成专家风险评估信息的丢失、忽略风险指标之间的相对重要性以及由于专家有限理性导致的评价固有的随机性等问题,利用区间值直觉模糊集和云模型构建了一种改进的FMEA风险评估方法。首先,引入区间值直觉模糊集(IVIFS)来描述专家评价信息的复杂性和不确定性,通过运用区间值直觉模糊熵,计算专家权重和风险因子的权重;其次,采用云模型的方法,通过比较各支持云模型和反对云模型与正、负理想云模型的正、负相似度,获得故障模式评价值的综合相似度,通过对综合相似度大小排序得到各故障模式风险排序;最后,以自动扶梯的梯级、踏板和胶带风险评估为例进行分析,验证该评估方法的实用性和可行性。
