SHTQS is an intelligent telephone-besed spoken dialyze system providing the infomation about the best route between two sites in Shanghai. Instead of separated parts of speech decoding and language parsing, a close co...SHTQS is an intelligent telephone-besed spoken dialyze system providing the infomation about the best route between two sites in Shanghai. Instead of separated parts of speech decoding and language parsing, a close cool,ration is carded out in SHTQS by integrating automatic speech recognizer （AS,R）, language understanding, dialogue management and speech generatot. In such a way, the erroneous analysis and uncertainty happening in the preceding stages would be recovered and determined acourately with high-level knowledge, Moreover, instead of shallow word-level analysis or simply keyword or key phrase matching, a deeper analysis is performed in our system by integrating a robust parser and a semantic interpreter. The robust parser is particularly important for spontanecos speech inputs because most of the inquiry sentences/phrases are ill-formed. In addition, in designinga mixed-initiative dialogue system, understanding users＇ inquiries is essential; however, simply matching keywords and/or key phrases can hardly achieve this. Therefore, a semantic interpreter is incorporated in oar system. The performnce of is also evaluated. The dialogue efficiency is 4.4 sentences per query on an average and the case precision rate of language understanding module is up to 81%. The results are satisfactory.展开更多
Yeats’ realistic poetry is often imprinted with the mark of its era. By means of the poetic language, Yeats expressed his profound reflection on the historic events of the time. In so doing, a dialogue has comes into...Yeats’ realistic poetry is often imprinted with the mark of its era. By means of the poetic language, Yeats expressed his profound reflection on the historic events of the time. In so doing, a dialogue has comes into existence between literature and history. This paper attempts to consider in detail how the dialogue between literature and history operates in Yeats’ realistic poem “Easter, 1916,” as a case study, under the scrutiny of the new historicist approach. Through the textual analysis of this poetic work, this paper discusses the dialogic relationship of the poem and history by elaborating on how this poetic work becomes historicized and how this historic event becomes textualized. Within this dialogue, the reciprocal relation of this poem and the contemporary society is brought under further examination. This paper argues that this poem harbors subversive force which can be articulated by the poetic text in this dialogue between literature and history. However, this subversive force will be eventually contained by the British power structure that has pervaded and dominated the Irish society. By the uprising and revolution of the Irish people, Ireland would attain to the goal of political de-Anglicization by becoming a sovereign state and with the advent of this political independence Irish literature could also achieve an independent status. However, this paper concludes that Yeats has realized the suppressed beauty of this independence because Irish literature would still have to be composed in the English language which, however, remains to be the product of the British power structure.展开更多
文摘SHTQS is an intelligent telephone-besed spoken dialyze system providing the infomation about the best route between two sites in Shanghai. Instead of separated parts of speech decoding and language parsing, a close cool,ration is carded out in SHTQS by integrating automatic speech recognizer （AS,R）, language understanding, dialogue management and speech generatot. In such a way, the erroneous analysis and uncertainty happening in the preceding stages would be recovered and determined acourately with high-level knowledge, Moreover, instead of shallow word-level analysis or simply keyword or key phrase matching, a deeper analysis is performed in our system by integrating a robust parser and a semantic interpreter. The robust parser is particularly important for spontanecos speech inputs because most of the inquiry sentences/phrases are ill-formed. In addition, in designinga mixed-initiative dialogue system, understanding users＇ inquiries is essential; however, simply matching keywords and/or key phrases can hardly achieve this. Therefore, a semantic interpreter is incorporated in oar system. The performnce of is also evaluated. The dialogue efficiency is 4.4 sentences per query on an average and the case precision rate of language understanding module is up to 81%. The results are satisfactory.
文摘Yeats’ realistic poetry is often imprinted with the mark of its era. By means of the poetic language, Yeats expressed his profound reflection on the historic events of the time. In so doing, a dialogue has comes into existence between literature and history. This paper attempts to consider in detail how the dialogue between literature and history operates in Yeats’ realistic poem “Easter, 1916,” as a case study, under the scrutiny of the new historicist approach. Through the textual analysis of this poetic work, this paper discusses the dialogic relationship of the poem and history by elaborating on how this poetic work becomes historicized and how this historic event becomes textualized. Within this dialogue, the reciprocal relation of this poem and the contemporary society is brought under further examination. This paper argues that this poem harbors subversive force which can be articulated by the poetic text in this dialogue between literature and history. However, this subversive force will be eventually contained by the British power structure that has pervaded and dominated the Irish society. By the uprising and revolution of the Irish people, Ireland would attain to the goal of political de-Anglicization by becoming a sovereign state and with the advent of this political independence Irish literature could also achieve an independent status. However, this paper concludes that Yeats has realized the suppressed beauty of this independence because Irish literature would still have to be composed in the English language which, however, remains to be the product of the British power structure.
