针对目前删余型Turbo码分量编码器盲识别问题,该文提出一种针对此码的改进型监督矩阵匹配算法。由于Turbo码在编码过程中进行了删余操作,接收端无法获得完整的递归系统卷积码(Recursive System Code,RSC)码字,传统的盲识别方法就不适用...针对目前删余型Turbo码分量编码器盲识别问题,该文提出一种针对此码的改进型监督矩阵匹配算法。由于Turbo码在编码过程中进行了删余操作,接收端无法获得完整的递归系统卷积码(Recursive System Code,RSC)码字,传统的盲识别方法就不适用于删余型Turbo码的识别。于是该算法在识别序列的构造上进行了改进,针对Turbo码在删余位上的码字与对应的RSC码有所区别的情况,将该位上的码字视为‘0’和‘1’等概率出现的误码,从而对删余位进行归零处理并选取合适的截取序列进行匹配度计算,根据最后匹配度的总分布情况对删余型Turbo码分量编码器的参数进行识别。仿真结果表明针对码长为256,码率为1/2的删余型Turbo码,在最大误比特率不超过0.033的情况下正确识别率能保持在80%以上。展开更多
This work investigates the performance of various forward error correction codes, by which the MIMO-OFDM system is deployed. To ensure fair investigation, the performance of four modulations, namely, binary phase shif...This work investigates the performance of various forward error correction codes, by which the MIMO-OFDM system is deployed. To ensure fair investigation, the performance of four modulations, namely, binary phase shift keying(BPSK), quadrature phase shift keying(QPSK), quadrature amplitude modulation(QAM)-16 and QAM-64 with four error correction codes(convolutional code(CC), Reed-Solomon code(RSC)+CC, low density parity check(LDPC)+CC, Turbo+CC) is studied under three channel models(additive white Guassian noise(AWGN), Rayleigh, Rician) and three different antenna configurations(2×2, 2×4, 4×4). The bit error rate(BER) and the peak signal to noise ratio(PSNR) are taken as the measures of performance. The binary data and the color image data are transmitted and the graphs are plotted for various modulations with different channels and error correction codes. Analysis on the performance measures confirm that the Turbo + CC code in 4×4 configurations exhibits better performance.展开更多
文摘针对目前删余型Turbo码分量编码器盲识别问题,该文提出一种针对此码的改进型监督矩阵匹配算法。由于Turbo码在编码过程中进行了删余操作,接收端无法获得完整的递归系统卷积码(Recursive System Code,RSC)码字,传统的盲识别方法就不适用于删余型Turbo码的识别。于是该算法在识别序列的构造上进行了改进,针对Turbo码在删余位上的码字与对应的RSC码有所区别的情况,将该位上的码字视为‘0’和‘1’等概率出现的误码,从而对删余位进行归零处理并选取合适的截取序列进行匹配度计算,根据最后匹配度的总分布情况对删余型Turbo码分量编码器的参数进行识别。仿真结果表明针对码长为256,码率为1/2的删余型Turbo码,在最大误比特率不超过0.033的情况下正确识别率能保持在80%以上。
文摘This work investigates the performance of various forward error correction codes, by which the MIMO-OFDM system is deployed. To ensure fair investigation, the performance of four modulations, namely, binary phase shift keying(BPSK), quadrature phase shift keying(QPSK), quadrature amplitude modulation(QAM)-16 and QAM-64 with four error correction codes(convolutional code(CC), Reed-Solomon code(RSC)+CC, low density parity check(LDPC)+CC, Turbo+CC) is studied under three channel models(additive white Guassian noise(AWGN), Rayleigh, Rician) and three different antenna configurations(2×2, 2×4, 4×4). The bit error rate(BER) and the peak signal to noise ratio(PSNR) are taken as the measures of performance. The binary data and the color image data are transmitted and the graphs are plotted for various modulations with different channels and error correction codes. Analysis on the performance measures confirm that the Turbo + CC code in 4×4 configurations exhibits better performance.
