Objective To investigate the clinical features and treatment of placenta previa complicated with previous caesarean section. Methods The clinical data of 29 patients with placenta previa complicated with a previous ca...Objective To investigate the clinical features and treatment of placenta previa complicated with previous caesarean section. Methods The clinical data of 29 patients with placenta previa complicated with a previous caesarean section (RCS group) admitted in Peking Union Medical College Hospital during a period from 2003 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed and compared with those of 243 patients with placenta previa without a previous caesarean section (FCS group) during the same period. Results There was no difference in the mean age (28.9±3.6 vs. 28.1±4.5 years) and the average gravidity (2.35±1.48 vs. 2.21±1.53) between RCS group and FCS group (all P>0.05). The RCS group had more preterm births (24.1% vs. 13.2%), complete placenta previa (55.2% vs. 4.9%), placenta accreta (34.5% vs. 2.5%), more blood loss during caesarean section (1412±602 vs. 648±265 mL), blood transfusion (51.7% vs. 4.9%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (13.8% vs. 2.1%), and obstetric hysterectomy (13.8% vs. 0.8%) than the FCS group (all P<0.05). The preterm infant rate (30.0% vs. 13.0%), neonatal asphyxia rate (10.0% vs. 4.9%), and perinatal mortality rate (6.7% vs. 0.4%) of the RCS group were higher than those of the FCS group (all P<0.05). Conclusions More patients had complete placenta previa and placenta accreta, postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, uterine packing, obstetric hysterectomy, and perinatal morbidity in the placenta previa patients with previous caesarean section. The patient should be informed of the risk and unnecessary first cesarean sections should be avoided.展开更多
Dear editor, In July 2015, a 39-year-old gravida 2, para 0 lady at 35 weeks＇ gestation was found collapsed at home and sent to the emergency department （ED） by ambulance. She had a background of chronic hypertensio...Dear editor, In July 2015, a 39-year-old gravida 2, para 0 lady at 35 weeks＇ gestation was found collapsed at home and sent to the emergency department （ED） by ambulance. She had a background of chronic hypertension on anti- hypertensives and aspirin, but repeatedly refused in- patient treatment for her uncontrolled hypertension. She had received pre-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation （CPR） for 17 minutes en route to the ED.展开更多
目的探讨脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛失败中转剖宫产的麻醉方式。方法120例脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛失败中转剖宫产产妇为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为A、B、C三组,各40例。A组实施腰硬联合麻醉,B组使用分娩镇痛留置的导管行硬膜外麻醉,C组实施...目的探讨脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛失败中转剖宫产的麻醉方式。方法120例脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛失败中转剖宫产产妇为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为A、B、C三组,各40例。A组实施腰硬联合麻醉,B组使用分娩镇痛留置的导管行硬膜外麻醉,C组实施气管插管全身麻醉(全麻)。比较三组围麻醉期并发症发生率,入室至切皮时间及麻醉至胎儿取出时间,新生儿出生时、出生1 min和出生5 min Apgar评分。结果C组围麻醉期高血压、低血压、恶心呕吐发生率显著低于A组和B组(P<0.05);三组围麻醉期误吸发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。C组入室至切皮时间和麻醉至胎儿取出时间分别为(8.2±1.6)、(5.3±0.7)min,均短于A组的(15.7±2.6)、(12.2±2.5)min和B组的(15.6±2.7)、(11.5±2.3)min(P<0.05)。C组新生儿出生时、出生1 min和出生5 min Apgar评分分别为(7.8±1.4)、(8.6±0.4)、(9.1±0.7)分,均显著高于A组的(7.0±0.7)、(7.4±0.6)、(8.0±0.5)分和B组的(7.1±0.8)、(7.5±0.6)、(8.1±0.5)分(P<0.05)。结论气管插管全麻用于脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛分娩失败中转剖宫产者,具有并发症少,快速娩出胎儿,减少新生儿窒息风险等优势。展开更多
基金Supported by Beijing Clinical Study(Z111107058811025)Beijing Government Excellent Person Sponsor Program
文摘Objective To investigate the clinical features and treatment of placenta previa complicated with previous caesarean section. Methods The clinical data of 29 patients with placenta previa complicated with a previous caesarean section (RCS group) admitted in Peking Union Medical College Hospital during a period from 2003 to 2011 were retrospectively reviewed and compared with those of 243 patients with placenta previa without a previous caesarean section (FCS group) during the same period. Results There was no difference in the mean age (28.9±3.6 vs. 28.1±4.5 years) and the average gravidity (2.35±1.48 vs. 2.21±1.53) between RCS group and FCS group (all P>0.05). The RCS group had more preterm births (24.1% vs. 13.2%), complete placenta previa (55.2% vs. 4.9%), placenta accreta (34.5% vs. 2.5%), more blood loss during caesarean section (1412±602 vs. 648±265 mL), blood transfusion (51.7% vs. 4.9%), disseminated intravascular coagulation (13.8% vs. 2.1%), and obstetric hysterectomy (13.8% vs. 0.8%) than the FCS group (all P<0.05). The preterm infant rate (30.0% vs. 13.0%), neonatal asphyxia rate (10.0% vs. 4.9%), and perinatal mortality rate (6.7% vs. 0.4%) of the RCS group were higher than those of the FCS group (all P<0.05). Conclusions More patients had complete placenta previa and placenta accreta, postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, uterine packing, obstetric hysterectomy, and perinatal morbidity in the placenta previa patients with previous caesarean section. The patient should be informed of the risk and unnecessary first cesarean sections should be avoided.
文摘Dear editor, In July 2015, a 39-year-old gravida 2, para 0 lady at 35 weeks＇ gestation was found collapsed at home and sent to the emergency department （ED） by ambulance. She had a background of chronic hypertension on anti- hypertensives and aspirin, but repeatedly refused in- patient treatment for her uncontrolled hypertension. She had received pre-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation （CPR） for 17 minutes en route to the ED.
文摘目的探讨脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛失败中转剖宫产的麻醉方式。方法120例脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛失败中转剖宫产产妇为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为A、B、C三组,各40例。A组实施腰硬联合麻醉,B组使用分娩镇痛留置的导管行硬膜外麻醉,C组实施气管插管全身麻醉(全麻)。比较三组围麻醉期并发症发生率,入室至切皮时间及麻醉至胎儿取出时间,新生儿出生时、出生1 min和出生5 min Apgar评分。结果C组围麻醉期高血压、低血压、恶心呕吐发生率显著低于A组和B组(P<0.05);三组围麻醉期误吸发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。C组入室至切皮时间和麻醉至胎儿取出时间分别为(8.2±1.6)、(5.3±0.7)min,均短于A组的(15.7±2.6)、(12.2±2.5)min和B组的(15.6±2.7)、(11.5±2.3)min(P<0.05)。C组新生儿出生时、出生1 min和出生5 min Apgar评分分别为(7.8±1.4)、(8.6±0.4)、(9.1±0.7)分,均显著高于A组的(7.0±0.7)、(7.4±0.6)、(8.0±0.5)分和B组的(7.1±0.8)、(7.5±0.6)、(8.1±0.5)分(P<0.05)。结论气管插管全麻用于脉冲泵椎管内分娩镇痛分娩失败中转剖宫产者,具有并发症少,快速娩出胎儿,减少新生儿窒息风险等优势。
