AIM: Inhibitors of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) have always been administered to improve the bioavailability of L-Dopa in the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD). A new three-dimensional quantitative structure-...AIM: Inhibitors of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) have always been administered to improve the bioavailability of L-Dopa in the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD). A new three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) analysis is performed to correlate the molecular fields with percent inhibition values. METHODS: Three predictive models were derived based on 36 previously reported COMT inhibitors employing comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) methodologies. RESULTS: The CoMFA model and CoMSIA model with steric and electrostatic field yielded cross-validated rcv2 0.585 and 0.528 respectively, whereas the conventional rncv2 were 0.979 and 0.891. The CoMSIA model with hydrophobic field exhibited rcv2 0.544 and rncv2 0.930. CONCLUSION: The derived models from CoMFA and CoMSIA all exhibit good prediction for both internal and external validations. The individual inspection of 3D contours generated from these models helps in understanding the possible region for structural modification of molecules to improve the inhibitory bioactivity. The 3D-QSAR models may be useful in designing and predicting novel COMT inhibitors.展开更多
文摘AIM: Inhibitors of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) have always been administered to improve the bioavailability of L-Dopa in the treatment of Parkinson disease (PD). A new three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship (3D-QSAR) analysis is performed to correlate the molecular fields with percent inhibition values. METHODS: Three predictive models were derived based on 36 previously reported COMT inhibitors employing comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA) methodologies. RESULTS: The CoMFA model and CoMSIA model with steric and electrostatic field yielded cross-validated rcv2 0.585 and 0.528 respectively, whereas the conventional rncv2 were 0.979 and 0.891. The CoMSIA model with hydrophobic field exhibited rcv2 0.544 and rncv2 0.930. CONCLUSION: The derived models from CoMFA and CoMSIA all exhibit good prediction for both internal and external validations. The individual inspection of 3D contours generated from these models helps in understanding the possible region for structural modification of molecules to improve the inhibitory bioactivity. The 3D-QSAR models may be useful in designing and predicting novel COMT inhibitors.
