摘要
罗萨和马克思都把人的异化问题视为理论研究的重要问题,关注资本主义现代化背景下人的现实生存状况和异化困境。不同的是,马克思从生产领域出发揭示了劳动异化的四种形式,将其概括为“生产的疏离”,马克思认为异化是由私有制和分工造成的,由此提出了变革生产方式来消除异化疏离。而罗萨站在社会加速的背景下加入了时间和空间面向,指出了五种新异化形式,将其概括为“心灵的隔阂”,并认为是社会加速导致了异化的诞生,所以他提出要建立“共鸣”来消除异化隔阂。因此,罗萨和马克思的异化理论在异化的概念、形式、形成逻辑、克服异化的途径等方面存在较大差异。比较罗萨与马克思异化理论,可以充分把握罗萨在社会加速背景下的异化理论的合理性和局限性,这对于洞察当代异化问题的新趋势、新特点,以人的自由全面发展为目标开展实践,具有世界观和方法论意义。
Both Rosa and Marx regard the issue of human alienation as a crucial subject in theoretical research,focusing on the existential conditions and alienated dilemmas of individuals under capitalist modernization.However,their approaches differ significantly.Marx,starting from the realm of production,reveals four forms of alienated labor,conceptualized as“estrangement in production”.He attributes alienation to private ownership and the division of labor,proposing the transformation of production modes to eliminate such estrangement.In contrast,Rosa,situated within the context of social acceleration,introduces temporal and spatial dimensions,identifies five new forms of alienation and summarizes them as“alienation of the mind”.He believes that social acceleration drives the emergence of alienation and advocates for establishing“resonance”to overcome this divide.Consequently,Rosa and Marx diverge markedly in their conceptualizations of alienation,its manifestations,underlying logic and proposed solutions.Comparing their theories helps illuminate the rationality and limitations of Rosa’s framework in the context of social acceleration.This comparison offers worldview and methodological significance for discerning contemporary trends and characteristics of alienation,and guiding practices aimed at achieving comprehensive human freedom and development.
作者
张翠
秦惠
ZHANG Cui;QIN Hui
出处
《南京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》
2025年第3期23-29,共7页
Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics AND Astronautics(Social Sciences)
关键词
罗萨
马克思
异化
社会加速
Rosa
Marx
alienation
social acceleration
作者简介
张翠,女,重庆理工大学马克思主义学院教授,主要研究方向为西方马克思主义与政治哲学;秦惠,女,重庆理工大学马克思主义学院硕士研究生,主要研究方向为马克思主义基本原理。
