摘要
长期以来,在寻求审判中心改革落脚点的过程中,人民陪审员制度的功能一直未能得到凸显。而陪审员相较于职业法官的非专业性与兼职性特征,恰能成为催生直接言词原则、集中审理原则、阻断审前信息干扰这三大庭审实质化制度支撑的天然优势,使人民陪审员制度得以成为“撬动”审判中心的“支点”。虽然如此,也应当理性看待支点的定位,因其具有间接性与偶然性,只有以“二阶行进”的务实路径才能实现改革目标:第一阶改革需解决陪审员实质参审问题,以提升陪审员参审意愿为重点,对陪审员的选任、合议庭组成环节进行优化,重塑其参审案件的范围;第二阶改革需以实质庭审的塑造为导向,着力提升陪审员的独立行权地位,重点在于调整法官司法责任的归责原理。
For a long time,in the process of seeking the foothold of the reform of the trial center,the function of the people's jury system has not been highlighted.Compared with professional judges,the non-professional and part-time characteristics of jurors can become a natural advantage to promote the principle of direct speech,the principle of centralized trial,and the blocking of pre-trial information interference,which are the three trial substantive system support,so that the people's jury system can become a"fulcrum"to"leverage"the trial center.However,we should look at the positioning of the fulcrum rationally,which is indirect and accidental,and only by the pragmatic path of"second-order progress"can we achieve the reform goal.The first stage of reform needs to solve the problem of the actual participation of jurors,focus on enhancing the willingness of jurors to participate in trial,optimize the selection and appointment of jurors,the composition of the collegiate panel,and reshape the scope of their participation in trial cases.The second stage of reform should be guided by the shaping of substantive trial,focusing on improving the independent executive status of jurors,and putting emphasis on adjusting the principle of judicial responsibility of judges.
作者
林铮汉
LIN Zhenghan(School of Criminal Law,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200050)
出处
《西安石油大学学报（社会科学版）》
2024年第4期108-115,共8页
Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University:Social Science Edition
基金
2024年华东政法大学研究生学术研究与社会调研项目“刑事诉讼全流程适用企业合规的公检法分工及制度研究”阶段成果(2024-3-052)。
关键词
人民陪审员制度
庭审实质化
陪而不审
陪审意愿
people's assessor system
substantive trial
accompany but not judge
jury will
作者简介
林铮汉,男,福建宁德人,华东政法大学刑事法学院硕士研究生,研究方向:刑事诉讼法学。
