摘要
作为公法规范的行政规章具有影响法律行为效力的效果,但由于一般法理学与部门法的观察视角不同,导致产生行政规章民法法源地位的认识间隙。在法律适用视角中,法律渊源是法官裁判约束力的规范来源。在实践中,司法机关内部也没有形成统一适用的行政规章裁判民事案件的标准。回归到公私法划分的视角下,“效力渊源”与“认知渊源”的划分方法能够有效认识行政规章的民法法源地位,行政规章作为民法的“认知渊源”能够发挥补充性的功能。借助《中华人民共和国民法典》第一百五十三条第二款的指引,行政规章构成了“公序良俗”概括条款的内容来源,形成了判断公序良俗的权威理由,从而影响法律行为的效力。
In the perspective of legal application,legal sources are the normative sources that have binding force on judges judgments.Administrative rules,as public law norms,have the effect of influencing the effectiveness of legal acts and should become the legal source of civil law.Due to the different perspectives of jurisprudence and departmental law,there is a gap in understanding the legal status of administrative rules in civil law.ln practice,there is no unified standard for applying administrative regulations to adjudicate civil cases within the court system.Returning to the perspective of dividing public and private laws,the method of dividing" "source of validity"and" "source of cognition"can effectively recognize the status of civil law sources of administrative regulations.Administrative regulations play a complementary role as the cognitive source of civil law.With the guidance of Article 153(2)of the Civil Code,administrative regulations constitute the content source of the general provisions of" public order and morality",forming authoritative reasons for judging public order and morality,thereby orderly affecting the effectiveness of legal acts.
出处
《行政与法》
2023年第11期93-104,共12页
Administration and Law
基金
国家社科基金一般项目“裁判说理援引立法目的条款的路径与方法研究”,项目编号:22BFX153。
关键词
法律渊源
行政规章
法律行为
公序良俗
source of law
administrative rules
legal acts
public order and morality
作者简介
张金禹,山东师范大学法学院硕士研究生,研究方向为宪法学与行政法学。
