摘要
自我优待是国际平台反垄断政策收紧之后出现的新型垄断行为。虽然欧盟已有自我优待的成案,但学术界对之依然存有诸多争议。通过对平台经济发展历史的梳理发现,自我优待是进入“互联网生态圈”阶段之后的产物,其背后蕴涵着平台经济从双边市场到跨界经营的竞争转型。以此为基础,可将自我优待分为两类:对商家实施的自我优待与对竞争平台实施的自我优待。前者存在滥用平台组织与管理职能的因素,可以进行严格反垄断规制;而后者可能是竞争机制的自然体现,应当尽量留待平台自行解决。
Self-preferencing became a new type of anti-competitive conduct after the policy on platform antitrust wastightened. Although the European Union has handled self-preferencing under EU competition law,it nonetheless re⁃mains disputed how to define this conduct in the academia. Based on the evolution of platform economy,selfpreferencingturned out once it entered the stage of Internet eco-system. Such a process is embedded in the competi⁃tion transition from two-sided markets to platform envelopment. Consequently,self-preferencing can be dividedinto two types,that against business users and that against competing platforms. The former might be strictly prohi⁃bited since platforms therein might abuse their market organizing and managing function,whereas the latter mightbe left for self-negotiation as it exemplifies the competition mechanism.
出处
《社会科学辑刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第3期25-35,F0002,237,共13页
Social Science Journal
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目(22AFX018)。
作者简介
侯利阳,法学博士,上海交通大学凯原法学院教授、博士生导师、科斯法经济学研究中心主任,教育部青年“长江学者”。主要研究领域为竞争法、数字经济规制、欧盟法、法经济学等。兼任SSCI期刊Computer Law&Security Review编委、上海市经济法学研究会副会长、Academic Society of Competition Law理事等。已出版专著四部、参著十部,在《中国法学》、Common Market Law Review等国内外权威期刊发表论文70余篇,学术成果多次被中英文刊物转载。主持国家社科重点项目、欧盟委员会重大招标项目子课题等国内外纵横向课题20余项。参与我国竞争法修订、欧盟电信法修订等立法活动。
