摘要
金在权总结了“层级个体化”方法论问题,它是否构成对突现的本体论拒斥?本质上,问题离不开基于逻辑必然性的反事实推理,其有效性依赖于不相容场景与反事实条件的解释相关性。通过模态反驳模式展开其逻辑结构,研究发现,解释相关性建立在层级由彼此分离的尺度区间所实现的必然模态之上,然而,适应度函数、物理律则显示了层级在连续尺度上分布的律则必然性,这反驳了该模态推论。本文为科学技术与社会领域的研究对层级给出一般说明的可能提供了辩护。
Jaegwon Kim concludes the problem on how levels to be individuated in methodology.Does it deny ontological commitment of emergence? Essentially,the problem is based on counterfactual reasoning,the validity of which yields to explanatory relevance between contradictions of scenarios and counterfactual conditionals.According to logical structures of the problem unfolded by alethic refuters,the study shows that explanatory relevance is determined by the necessity modality of realization of levels by separated scales intervals.However,the modal deduction is refuted by the continuous distribution of levels across scales shown by fitness functions and physical laws.This paper defends the possibility of universal description of levels from studies in science,technology and sociology.
作者
孙圣
SUN Sheng(School of Philosophy,Northwest Normal University,Lanzhou,Gansu,730070)
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第5期42-48,共7页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“海德格尔逻辑哲学思想研究”(项目编号:17YJC720043)。
关键词
适应度函数
模态反驳
思想实验
律则必然性
因果涌现
Fitness functions
Alethic refuters
Thought experiments
Nomological necessity
Casual emergence
作者简介
孙圣(1986-)男,山东黄县人,西北师范大学哲学学院特聘副教授,研究方向为科学思想史、物理哲学、突现论。Email:sunsheng@xmu.edu.cn。
