摘要
通过对人文社科领域博士的问卷调查发现,在课堂讨论、项目参与、前沿涉猎、跨学科学习和导师交流5个方面的学术经历中,导师交流得分最高,前沿涉猎得分最低。在博士学位论文质量的自评上,博士对学位论文的综合质量评价较高、成果创新性评价较低。回归分析显示,项目参与对博士学位论文的综合质量、前沿涉猎、创新性均有显著正效应,课堂讨论、跨学科学习和导师交流对博士学位论文的综合质量和成果创新性均没有显著效应。
Based on the survey data of doctors,it is found that doctors in humanities and social sciences score highest on communication with mentor and lowest on forefront experience among five aspects of the academic experience,including class discussion,program involvement,forefront experience,interdisciplinary learning,and communication with mentor.Doctors evaluate the overall quality of their dissertations highly while evaluate innovation lowly.Regression analysis shows that program involvement has a significant positive effect on the overall quality of doctoral dissertations,and forefront experience has a significant positive effect on their innovation.However,class discussion,interdisciplinary learning and communication with mentor have no significant effect on the overall quality or innovation of doctoral dissertations.
作者
许丹东
吕林海
张红霞
顾亚琳
邵然
XU Dandong;LV Linhai;ZHANG Hongxia;GU Yalin;SHAO Ran(Institute of Education, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, China;Jiangsu Open University, Nanjing 210036, Jiangsu, China)
出处
《复旦教育论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第3期60-66,112,共8页
Fudan Education Forum
关键词
学术经历
博士学位论文
前沿涉猎
博士生教育
Academic Experience
Doctoral Dissertation
Forefront Experience
Doctoral Education
作者简介
许丹东,1985 年生,男,山东单县人,南京大学教育研究院博士生;吕林海,1977 年生,男,江苏南京人,南京大学教育研究院教授,博士;张红霞,1959 年生,女,江苏淮安人,南京大学教育研究院教授,博士;顾亚琳,1979 年生,女,江苏阜宁人,南京大学教育研究院硕士;邵然,1992 年生,女,江苏南京人,江苏开放大学研究实习员。
