期刊文献+

保留棘突韧带复合体的双侧椎板开窗联合椎间融合治疗腰椎滑脱症 被引量:5

Effect of bilateral vertebral lamina fenestration combined with interbody fusion under retaining spinous process and ligament in the treatment of spondylolisthesis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察保留棘突韧带复合体的双侧椎板开窗、复位、椎间融合内固定手术治疗腰椎滑脱症的疗效。方法:选取31例患有腰椎滑脱症病人,随机分成保留棘突韧带复合体组(A组)14例和全椎板切除组(B组)17例,分别行双侧椎板开窗减压、椎弓根钉固定复位椎体间融合手术和全椎板切除减压、复位椎体间融合手术。对2组病人手术前后日本骨科协会评估治疗(JOA)评分变化值、手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后3个月融合率进行比较。结果:A组手术前后JOA评分变化值显著高于B组(P<0.05),术后引流量显著低于B组(P<0.05)。2组术后3个月融合率、手术时间及术中出血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:保留棘突韧带复合体的双侧椎板开窗椎间融合手术是治疗腰椎滑脱症的一种满意手术方法。 Objective:To investigate the efficacy of the bilateral vertebral lamina fenestration,reseting combined with interbody fusion under retaining spinous process and ligament complex in the treatment of lumber spondylolisthesis. Methods:Thirty-one patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were randomly divided into the retaining spinous process(group A) and total laminectomy group(group B). The A group were treated with bilateral vertebral lamina fenestration,decompress combined with interbody fusion,and the group B were treated with total laminectomy decompress combined with interbody fusion. The JOA scores before and after operation,operation time, blood loss,postoperative drainage and fusion rate after 3 months of operation between two groups were compared. Results:The change of JOA score between before and after operation in group A was significantly higher than that in group B(P〈0. 05). The postoperative drainage volume in group A was significantly lower than that in group B(P〈0. 05). The differences of the fusion rate after 3 months of operation,operation time and peroperative bleeding between two groups were not statistically significant(P〉0. 05). Conclusions:Under remaining spinous process and ligament complex,the treatment of lumber spondylolisthesis with bilateral vertebral lamina fenestration combined with interbody fusion is a good method.
作者 孙保安 王予治 刘其明 孙羽 SUN Bao-an WANG Yu-zhi LIU Qi-ming SUN Yu(Department of Orthopedics, The People's Hospital of Huaibei ,Huaibei Anhui 235000, Chin)
出处 《蚌埠医学院学报》 CAS 2017年第7期885-887,共3页 Journal of Bengbu Medical College
关键词 腰椎滑脱症 棘突韧带复合体 椎管减压 椎体间融合 腰痛 lumbar spondylolisthesis spinous process and ligament complex spinal canal decompression interbody fusion backache
作者简介 孙保安(1980-),男,硕士,主治医师.
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献54

  • 1王波,刘海鹰,王会民,朱震齐,钱亚龙,张健.腰椎间融合结合椎弓根内固定治疗老年重度腰椎管狭窄症的临床体会[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(16):1125-1126. 被引量:11
  • 2[1]Shin H C,Yi S,Kim K N,et al.Posterior lumbar interbody fusion via a unilateral approach[J].Yonsei Med J,2006,47(3):319-325.
  • 3[2]Rao R D,David K S,Wang M.Biomechanical changes at adjacent segments following anterior lumbar fusion interbody fusion using tapered cages[J].Spine,2005,30(24):2772-2776.
  • 4[3]Rahm M D,Hall B B.Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation:a retrospective study[J].J Spinal Disord,1996,9 (5):392-400.
  • 5[4]Miyakoshi N,Abe E,Shimada Y.et al.Outcome of one-level posterior lumber interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion[J].Spine,2000,25(14):1837-1842.
  • 6[5]Etebar S,Cahill D W.Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability[J].J Neurosurg,1999,90(2 Suppl)):163-169.
  • 7[6]Chen W J,Lai P L,Niu C C,et al.Surgical treatment of adjacent instability after lumbar spine fusion[J].Spine,2001,26(22):E519-524.
  • 8[8]Teo E C,Lee K K,Qiu T X,et al.The biomechanics of lumbar graded facetectomy under anterior-shear load[J].IEEE Trans Biomed Eng,2004,51 (3):443-449.
  • 9[9]Ozgur B M,Yoo K,Rodriguez G,et al.Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)[J].Eur Spine J,2005,14(9):887-894.
  • 10[10]Zhao J,Hou T,Wang X,et al.Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using one diagonal fusion cage with transpedicular screw/rod fixation[J].Eur Spine J,2003,12(2):173-177.

共引文献113

同被引文献47

引证文献5

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部