期刊文献+

荀子人性论的中期发展——论《礼论》《正名》《性恶》的性-伪说 被引量:11

Diachronic Development of Xun Zi's Theory of Human Nature——On Pseudo-Theory of Human Nature in Theory of Ritual, Correcting Meanings,and Evil Facade of Human Nature
原文传递
导出
摘要 荀子一生可分为居赵(前期)、游齐(中期)、退居兰陵(晚期)三个阶段,其人性论思想经历了一个发展变化的过程,《荀子》各篇是在不同时期完成的,记录的是荀子不同时期的看法。其中《礼论》《正名》《性恶》是荀子中期的作品,其特点是提出了性-伪说,不再将知视为性,而是提出了伪,以伪来统一能知和所知,但在认识上又有一个发展过程。《礼论》提出了性朴说,但从语境上看,其性主要是指吉凶忧愉之情以及对亲人的爱,而其所谓伪主要指礼义之节文;《正名》通过对性、伪的两重定义,明确了性、伪的内涵,标志着荀子性-伪说的成熟;《性恶》则利用性-伪说对人性做了探讨和分析,提出了性恶善伪说。 Xun Zi's early writings, Make the State Wealthy and Honor or Disgrace, proposes a theory of emotion and intellect, and believes that yielding to emotion would result in rivalry and disorder, while human intellect could make selection and judgment. These ideas set a basic dimension of Xun Zi's theory of human nature, but they are imperfect in naming human nature for emotion and intellect, also the born ability of cognition (namely, knowing) and learned result of knowing (namely, known). His Theory of Ritual, Correcting Meanings, and Evil Facade of Human Nature propose a theory of pseudo-nature, which no longer takes knowledge as human nature and, on the contrary, puts up a concept of pseudo-nature to unify knowing and known with a process of epistemological development. Theory of Ritual proposes a theory of naive-nature and, in its context, refers chiefly to emotion for good luck, ill luck, worry and joy, as well as love for one's kith and kin. It's pseudo-nature refers to a simple saying of rituals. Correcting Meanings explicitly defines nature and pseudo through a dual definition, which marks the maturity of Xun Zi's pseudo-nature theory. Evil Fafade of Human Nature probes and analyzes human nature by pseudo- nature theory and proposes his famous theory of evil human nature pretending good.
作者 梁涛
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第4期28-41,共14页 Academic Monthly
基金 中国人民大学明德学者支持计划"新出土文献与早期儒学"(10XNJ028)前期成果
关键词 情性 知性 能知 所知 朴伪 emotion intellect knowing known pseudo-naive
作者简介 梁涛,中国人民大学国学院、出土文献与中国古代文明研究协同创新中心教授(北京100872)。
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献32

  • 1虞圣强.荀子“性恶”论新解[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),1996,38(4):80-83. 被引量:5
  • 2韦政通.《荀子与古代哲学》,台湾商务印书馆1997年第2版,第114页.
  • 3《郭店竹简与思孟学派》.中国人民大学出版社,2008年版.第158-183页.
  • 4《中国古代思想史论》,人民出版社1986年版.
  • 5.《孟子》[M].,..
  • 6.《荀子》[M].,..
  • 7.《春秋繁露》[M].,..
  • 8.《论语》[M].,..
  • 9黄彰健.《孟子性论之研究》[J].历史语言研究所集刊(台湾中央研究院),1955,26.
  • 10牟宗三.2003年.《圆善论》,载《牟宗三先生全集》第22卷,台湾经联出版公司.

同被引文献52

引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部