摘要
尼采在20世纪欧陆哲学中引起的震荡到处可见,不过在德法之间,对尼采的解读却呈现出迥然不同的路线,比如海德格尔和德勒兹对尼采的解读。海德格尔力图保持西方哲学的统一性,把尼采的思想归置于形而上学的最终完成;德勒兹却认为尼采超越了形而上学,通过驱逐根植在思想中的虚无主义而扭转了西方哲学的发展方向。
Nietzsche is an event that occurs in modern philosophy. He creates a new way of think-ing and writing which shocks the foundation of the continental philosophy. From Marx Scheler toJürgen Habermas, from Pierre Klossowski to Jacque Derrida, Nietzsche is reactivated from time totime. However, between German philosophers and French philosophers, the interpretation of Nietzscheis carried along different ways. Martin Heidegger and Gilles Deleuze have developed Nietzsche intodifferent philosophical figures. Heidegger, in his effort of keeping the unity of Western philosophy,sees Nietzsche as the final completion and also the peak of metaphysics. In contrast, Deleuze thinksthat Nietzsche has gone beyond the tradition of metaphysics and brings the Western philosophy intoa new landscape with the expulsion of nihilism rooted in thought.
出处
《中国高校社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期66-76,共11页
Social Sciences in Chinese Higher Education Institutions
基金
中国人民大学统筹建设世界一流大学和一流学科建设经费支持
关键词
海德格尔
德勒兹
强力意志
永恒轮回
虚无主义
Martin Heidegger
Gilles Deleuze
Will to Power
Eternal Return
Nihilism
作者简介
李科林，中国人民大学哲学院副教授
