摘要
目的研究外周静脉不同采血方法对血标本溶血的影响,为提高血液检验的准确度提供参考。方法选择2015年1月至2015年3月在我院进行静脉采血的患者840例,随机分为三组各280例。A组使用单纯采血器采血,B组使用留置针连接注射器采血,C组使用留置针连接采血器采血,比较三组的溶血程度。结果 A组溶血总发生率为3.93%,显著低于B组和C组的27.14%和13.57%,且A组的轻度、中度、重度溶血发生率(2.86%、0.71%、0.36%)亦均为最低,C组次之(8.21%、4.29%、1.07%),B组最高(18.93%、5.71%、2.50%),三组相比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用留置针连接注射器进行采血的溶血发生率最高,单纯采血器进行采血的溶血发生率最低。
Objective To study the effect of different blood sampling methods in peripheral venous on hemolysis of blood samples and provide reference for improving the accuracy of the blood test. Methods Eight hundred and forty patients received venous blood sampling in our hospital from January 2015 to March 2015 were selected and randomly divided into three groups. Group A used the simple blood collection, group B was collected by indwelling needle connecting syringe, and group C used the indwelling needle connecting the hemostix. The hemolytic degree was compared among three groups. Results The total incidence rate of group A was 3.93%, which was significantly lower than that of group B （27.14%） and C （13.57%）. The mild, moderate, severe hemolysis of group A （2.86%, 0.71%, 0.36%） were also lower than those of the group B （18.93%, 5.71%, 2.50%） and group C （8.21%, 4.29%, 1.07%）, and the differences were statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion The rate of hemolysis of using the indwelling needle connecting syringe was the highest and the hemolysis rate by using the hemostix was the lowest.
出处
《临床医学研究与实践》
2016年第21期151-152,共2页
Clinical Research and Practice
关键词
采血器
留置针
溶血
hemostix
indwelling needle
hemolysis
作者简介
刘磊（1977-），男，汉族，陕西西安人，主治医生，学士。研究方向：临床输血。
