摘要
司法实践中认定滥用市场支配地位行为已经形成了较为固定的思维模式,但是某些关键性问题仍需要更深入研究和思考。界定相关市场时,定性分析方法(替代分析法)和定量分析方法(假定垄断者测试法)需要更合理的解释和操作方法;而涉知识产权案件、涉行业协会等特殊主体案件中市场支配地位的特殊性,进一步应证了"市场份额在判定市场支配地位时作用相对弱化"的观点;行为导致限制竞争的结果虽然是认定滥用市场支配地位行为的必要要件,但个案中可通过要求被告证明"合理理由"的存在减轻原告的举证责任。
As it has been a fixed mind-set that the abuse of market dominance is affirmed in judicial practice, some key issues are still needed to be further studied and reflected. When defining the relevant market, qualitative analysis （alternative analysis method） and quantitative analysis （the hypothetical monopolist test） need more reasonable explanation and method of operation; the specialty of market dominance in cases of special subject, which involves intellectual property and industry association, further verifies the point of view ＂market share is playing a relatively weakening role in judging market dominance＂. Although the fact the behavior restricts the competition is the essential condition to identify the behavior of abusing market dominance, the plaintiff＇s burden of proof can be reduced through requiring the defendant to demonstrate ＂reasonable grounds＂ in the case.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期260-280,共21页
China Legal Science
作者简介
最高人民法院审判委员会专职委员，二级大法官。
