期刊文献+

黄土高原不同生物气候区土壤侵蚀动态变化研究 被引量:3

Spatial-temporal changes of soil erosion of different bioclimatic zones in the Loess Plateau
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于地理信息系统(GIS)和遥感(RS)技术,利用修正的通用土壤流失方程(RUSLE)模型,结合遥感影像、数字高程数据(DEM)、土壤类型数据及相关统计资料确定了模型参数因子,在重点分析我国黄土高原不同生物气候区降雨侵蚀力因子和植被覆盖因子时空变化特征的基础上,计算出各区2000~2012年土壤侵蚀模数,分析了土壤侵蚀强度的时空动态变化特征。结果表明:区域多年平均土壤侵蚀量为1.35×109t,土壤侵蚀模数为2 264 t/(km2·a)。土壤侵蚀强度以微度侵蚀和轻度侵蚀为主,侵蚀面积比例为74.31%;近13 a来,黄土高原的土壤侵蚀强度呈显著降低的变化趋势(P=0.03),平均每年减少54.22 t/(km2·a)。土壤侵蚀正在向微度、轻度土壤侵蚀转变,土壤侵蚀模数减少的区域占整个侵蚀区域的69.05%,增加的区域占30.95%。研究结果对黄土高原区域生态恢复和生态建设具有一定的指导意义。 With the geographic information system(GIS) and remote sensing(RS) technology,and based on remote sensing image data,digital elevation model(DEM) data,soil type data and relevant statistical data,by the modified revised universal soil loss equation(RUSLE),we first analyzed the spatial and temporal dynamic changes of rainfall erosion factor and vegetation cover factor of different bioclimatic zones,then calculated the soil erosion modulus of these zones in the Loess Plateau from 2000 to 2012 and explored the spatial and temporal dynamic changes of soil erosion intensity in this region.The result showed that the average annual amount of soil erosion was 1.35 billion tons and the average soil erosion modulus was 2 264 t·km-2·a-1; soil erosion type were mainly slight erosion and light erosion,accounting for 74.31% of the total area of soil erosion.; the soil erosion of the Loess Plateau presents a decreasing trend from 2000 to 2012(P = 0.03),with a rate of 54.22 t·km-2·a-1; soil erosion intensity transforms into slight and light erosion.About 69.05% of the region showed decreasing trend while the rest showed increasing trend(30.95%).This study is of great significance to the ecological restoration and construction of the Loess Plateau.
作者 胡克志
出处 《人民长江》 北大核心 2016年第13期16-23,共8页 Yangtze River
基金 陕西省能源开发水土保持动态监测信息系统开发研究项目(1204010725)
关键词 土壤侵蚀 生物气候区 RUSLE 黄土高原 soil erosion bioclimatic zones RUSLE Loess Plateau
作者简介 胡克志,男,高级工程师,主要从事水土保持监测研究工作。E—mail:hkz0809@126.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Mekonnen M, Keesstra S D, Stroosnijder L, et al. Soil conservation through sediment trapping: a review [ J]. Land Degradation and De- velopment, 2015, 26(6): 544-556.
  • 2http ://www. mwr. gov. cn/slzx/slyw/201305/t20130517 435841. ht- ml.
  • 3李智广,曹炜,刘秉正,罗志东.我国水土流失状况与发展趋势研究[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(1):57-62. 被引量:93
  • 4Laflen J M, Lane L J, Foster G R. WEPP: A new generation of ero- sion prediction technology [ J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conserva- tion, 1991, 46(1) : 34 -38.
  • 5De Roo P J, Offermans R J E, Cremers N. A single - event physical- ly - based hydrological and soil erosion model for drainage basins. II : sensitivity analysis, validation and application [ J ]. Hydrological processes, 1996, 10(8): 1119-1126.
  • 6Perovi V, Ivoti L, Kadovi R, et al. Spatial modelling of soil erosion potential in a mountainous watershed of South - eastern Serbia [ J ]. Environmental earth sciences, 2013, 68 ( 1 ) : 115 - 128.
  • 7程琳,杨勤科,谢红霞,王春梅,郭伟玲.基于GIS和CSLE的陕西省土壤侵蚀定量评价方法研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):61-66. 被引量:99
  • 8Wischmeier W H, Smith D D. Predicting rainfall erosion losses - A guide to conservation planning[ M]. Predicting rainfall erosion losses -A guide to conservation planning, 1978.
  • 9Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A, et al. RUSLE a guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation [ M ]. USDA Agricultural Handbook, 1997.
  • 10Prasannakumar V, Shiny R, Geetha N, et al. Spatial prediction of soil erosion risk by remote sensing, GIS and RUSLE approach: a case study of Siruvani river watershed in Attapady valley, Kerala, India[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2011, 64(4): 965- 972.

二级参考文献133

共引文献1423

同被引文献64

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部